R: 276 / I: 68
Report on what's new in your country and discuss news on other people's countries! And make sure to post sauce aswell!
And let's begin with news from Latvia:
In the past year there have been registered 400'000 attempts to access cheese pizza related content in Latvia.
https://jauns.lv/raksts/zinas/327732-apmeram-gada-laika-latvija-registreti-400-000-meginajumu-interneta-pieklut-bernu-pornografijai
Gambling sites are now banned in the capital, excluding casinos in 4 and 5 star hotels. (Pretty much just like uncle Adolf did in the 30s)
https://www.delfi.lv/bizness/biznesa_vide/rigas-dome-lemusi-par-spelu-zalu-likvidesanu-riga-sekos-tiesas-procesi.d?id=50943463
Wagecuck teachers are threatening to go on a strike because of low wages (these fuckers do this like twice a year).
https://www.delfi.lv/news/national/politics/algu-ultimats-skolotaji-piedraud-ar-streiku-septembri.d?id=51004121
>inb4 what kind of nigger language are these news in?
For all foreign news: Post sauce, and be sure to write a tl;dr in english.
Daily global news
ITT:Report on what's new in your country and discuss news on other people's countries! And make sure to post sauce aswell!
And let's begin with news from Latvia:
In the past year there have been registered 400'000 attempts to access cheese pizza related content in Latvia.
https://jauns.lv/raksts/zinas/327732-apmeram-gada-laika-latvija-registreti-400-000-meginajumu-interneta-pieklut-bernu-pornografijai
Gambling sites are now banned in the capital, excluding casinos in 4 and 5 star hotels. (Pretty much just like uncle Adolf did in the 30s)
https://www.delfi.lv/bizness/biznesa_vide/rigas-dome-lemusi-par-spelu-zalu-likvidesanu-riga-sekos-tiesas-procesi.d?id=50943463
Wagecuck teachers are threatening to go on a strike because of low wages (these fuckers do this like twice a year).
https://www.delfi.lv/news/national/politics/algu-ultimats-skolotaji-piedraud-ar-streiku-septembri.d?id=51004121
>inb4 what kind of nigger language are these news in?
For all foreign news: Post sauce, and be sure to write a tl;dr in english.
R: 34 / I: 5
Will he win re-election?
I'm not so sure. I don't care what you think about him, or if you think he should/shouldn't win. I want to know, what are the chances that he will?
R: 19 / I: 4
Guys, I encourage all of you, with your own form of National Socialism to go and have your local community SECEDE from the united states and become EMPIRES, the united states is gonna collapse eventually, we are just speeding it up.
Guys, I encourage all of you, with your own form of National Socialism to go and have your local community SECEDE from the united states and become EMPIRES, the united states is gonna collapse eventually, we are just speeding it up.
R: 50 / I: 4
Does anyone else just feel a strong urge to punch this retard?
Does anyone else just feel a strong urge to punch this retard?
R: 5 / I: 0
I need to clarify something.
I am not talking about sex with minors I am talking everything but sex.
like what is the legal age for driving and do you think that it should change?
and anything else that has a legal age like shooting, driving, drinking, doing drugs.
anything that is not SEX.
and do you guys think that if you had a child how different your answer would be.
Legal age. NOT PEDOSHIT.
Since that last thread got deleted in a fucking flash thanks jannies.I need to clarify something.
I am not talking about sex with minors I am talking everything but sex.
like what is the legal age for driving and do you think that it should change?
and anything else that has a legal age like shooting, driving, drinking, doing drugs.
anything that is not SEX.
and do you guys think that if you had a child how different your answer would be.
R: 1 / I: 0
You do read National Vanguard, right /pol/?
You do read National Vanguard, right /pol/?
R: 29 / I: 22
/pol/itical humor thread
Threads like these aren't much for conversations, but it should be rather interesting nevertheless.
R: 5 / I: 0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uLTeMC81FV0
It starts off as a critique of jimmy kimmel, but then delves into how much the left is over-obsessed with donald trump and how it's loosing touch with real issues which plague america and instead invents new bullshitty ones (like "check your privilege"), and how politics are becoming more polarized and extreme
And he isn't necessarily a conservative guy (he doesn't directly declare his position, rather shows the flaws of the modern left and shares general views) just a relatively sane human being imo
I consider myself leftist, at least to some extent, and not in the sense of modern american leftism. And I really enjoyed this video
EmpLemon
EmpLemon is a youtube channel with mostly narrative or rant type of videos, and I believe his takes on politics (despite it being far from the main focus of the channel) are amongst the most sane I've heard in a while. I really liked this video in particular:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uLTeMC81FV0
It starts off as a critique of jimmy kimmel, but then delves into how much the left is over-obsessed with donald trump and how it's loosing touch with real issues which plague america and instead invents new bullshitty ones (like "check your privilege"), and how politics are becoming more polarized and extreme
And he isn't necessarily a conservative guy (he doesn't directly declare his position, rather shows the flaws of the modern left and shares general views) just a relatively sane human being imo
I consider myself leftist, at least to some extent, and not in the sense of modern american leftism. And I really enjoyed this video
R: 5 / I: 3
Redpill thread
Drop redpill.
R: 6 / I: 1
Why don't we just ditch facebook and twitter and move back to myspace? At least Tom never censored anyone for having the wrong political opinion. Bring myspace back into popularity and also create a "right-wing" controversy! It'd be a hilarious sight to see. Who's with me?
Why don't we just ditch facebook and twitter and move back to myspace? At least Tom never censored anyone for having the wrong political opinion. Bring myspace back into popularity and also create a "right-wing" controversy! It'd be a hilarious sight to see. Who's with me?
R: 58 / I: 10
I think it would also be interesting to learn what Korean netizens would make of these revelations.
Korean Air Lines Flight 007, per the official story (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Korean_Air_Lines_Flight_007), was a routine scheduled flight from New York City to Seoul with a refueling stopover in Anchorage, Alaska. The flight was via a Boeing 747-200, aged 11 years (11 is a commonly recurring number in psyops). The flight departed on 31 August 1983 from JFK and arrived in Anchorage uneventfully. It is when the flight continued on its ANC-Seoul leg that things went awry. The flight strayed from its course and crossed over into Soviet territory. The Soviets, thinking the plane was an American spy plane, shot down Flight 007 in the early dark hours of 1 September some distance away from Sakhalin Island, killing all 269 on board.
Already something funny right away is the flight number, 007. KAL 007 was accused of being a spy plane, and you know where else 007 has a spy theme? Fictional MI6 agent James Bond, "007". So this flight number is referencing a work of fiction. Should we then presume KAL 007 is as equally fictitious? And why Flight 007 and not just Flight 7 like pretty much every other airline does it?
Another oddity is that despite being a Korean airliner bound for Seoul, only 76 of the supposed passengers were Korean nationals, another 29 Koreans being KAL employees. 62 of the passengers were American, despite Korea not being such a popular destination for Westerners prior to the 21st century (in 1983, South Korea was under a military dictatorship and was by and large still a developing country, which also makes it an odd choice to be awarded the 1988 Summer Olympics in 1981).
Among the Americans was Senator Larry McDonald (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Larry_McDonald), an ultraconservative Democrat from Georgia who upon further inspection seems to have had some of his life story lifted from holowood-nazi spook George Lincoln Rockwell. Like Rockwell, McDonald was a Naval flight officer who married an Icelandic woman and was a member of the John Birch Society. The two differ in their stories, of course, with McDonald seeming like a Rockwell who remained a jew-neutral politician. McDonald's middle name Patton is probably referencing General George S. Patton, who my opinion was a cryptojew with a fake death, but that's for another time. Larry McDonald thus most likely was either an actor with a fake name, or a real-named (((royal blood))) spook.
But let's also look at some of the other "passengers" on this supposed flight. There are some pretty strange stories. Many of these passengers (including McDonald) nearly missed the flight or were originally supposed to be on other flights (something similar with Pan Am 103, TWA 800, and the 9/11 flights):
From https://people.com/archive/cover-story-faces-of-flight-007-vol-20-no-12/ and I encourage you to read it to understand the BS being peddled.
>The horror and outrage provoked by the disaster in the night sky 33,000 feet over the Sea of Japan was undiminished in the days that followed.
There it is, 33. To be fair, 33,000 feet is the typical altitude for long haul flights. Wonder why that is though, and not 32,000 feet.
"Becky Scruton":
>Becky stood in his Meriden, Conn. hospital room and sang It Is Well With My Soul in a fine soprano voice which moved nurses in the room to tears.
Soul, Seoul, ha ha, very funny.
>Becky Scruton took an airport limousine to Kennedy for a flight to Korea on Saturday, Aug. 27. There she found that she had neglected to bring her passport, and she booked passage on Tuesdays flight instead.
"John Oldham":
>Oldham, 27, a recent law-school graduate, was booked to fly on Monday night but postponed his trip for 24 hours so he could help some visiting Chinese scholars to find housing near New Yorks Columbia University.
"Han Tae Park":
>On the day of the flight, in fact, Park had asked Chung to take a walk with him. To my surprise, he talked about dying, remembers Chung. He told me that the most dreadful thing would be to die in a plane crash because in that kind of an accident, even though you were in danger, you cant do anything.
"Jan Hjalmarsson":
>A globe-trotting Swedish entrepreneur who lived in Queens, N.Y., Hjalmarsson, 38, was originally booked on a flight scheduled to leave New York at 5 p.m. When he discovered that Flight 007 would take off seven hours later yet arrive in Seoul at almost the same time, he eagerly changed his reservation.
PART 1
Korean Air Lines flights 007 and 858 were faked
I'll go into these psyops in chronological order. But to make a long story short, no one died, and no flights were shot down or bombed. I make my presumptions based on the usual funny stories being peddled in these psyops and their suspicious numerologies. When these things happen over and over and over again, you're being fed bullshit. Granted, this isn't rock hard proof of fakery, but it strongly points into that direction.I think it would also be interesting to learn what Korean netizens would make of these revelations.
Korean Air Lines Flight 007, per the official story (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Korean_Air_Lines_Flight_007), was a routine scheduled flight from New York City to Seoul with a refueling stopover in Anchorage, Alaska. The flight was via a Boeing 747-200, aged 11 years (11 is a commonly recurring number in psyops). The flight departed on 31 August 1983 from JFK and arrived in Anchorage uneventfully. It is when the flight continued on its ANC-Seoul leg that things went awry. The flight strayed from its course and crossed over into Soviet territory. The Soviets, thinking the plane was an American spy plane, shot down Flight 007 in the early dark hours of 1 September some distance away from Sakhalin Island, killing all 269 on board.
Already something funny right away is the flight number, 007. KAL 007 was accused of being a spy plane, and you know where else 007 has a spy theme? Fictional MI6 agent James Bond, "007". So this flight number is referencing a work of fiction. Should we then presume KAL 007 is as equally fictitious? And why Flight 007 and not just Flight 7 like pretty much every other airline does it?
Another oddity is that despite being a Korean airliner bound for Seoul, only 76 of the supposed passengers were Korean nationals, another 29 Koreans being KAL employees. 62 of the passengers were American, despite Korea not being such a popular destination for Westerners prior to the 21st century (in 1983, South Korea was under a military dictatorship and was by and large still a developing country, which also makes it an odd choice to be awarded the 1988 Summer Olympics in 1981).
Among the Americans was Senator Larry McDonald (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Larry_McDonald), an ultraconservative Democrat from Georgia who upon further inspection seems to have had some of his life story lifted from holowood-nazi spook George Lincoln Rockwell. Like Rockwell, McDonald was a Naval flight officer who married an Icelandic woman and was a member of the John Birch Society. The two differ in their stories, of course, with McDonald seeming like a Rockwell who remained a jew-neutral politician. McDonald's middle name Patton is probably referencing General George S. Patton, who my opinion was a cryptojew with a fake death, but that's for another time. Larry McDonald thus most likely was either an actor with a fake name, or a real-named (((royal blood))) spook.
But let's also look at some of the other "passengers" on this supposed flight. There are some pretty strange stories. Many of these passengers (including McDonald) nearly missed the flight or were originally supposed to be on other flights (something similar with Pan Am 103, TWA 800, and the 9/11 flights):
From https://people.com/archive/cover-story-faces-of-flight-007-vol-20-no-12/ and I encourage you to read it to understand the BS being peddled.
>The horror and outrage provoked by the disaster in the night sky 33,000 feet over the Sea of Japan was undiminished in the days that followed.
There it is, 33. To be fair, 33,000 feet is the typical altitude for long haul flights. Wonder why that is though, and not 32,000 feet.
"Becky Scruton":
>Becky stood in his Meriden, Conn. hospital room and sang It Is Well With My Soul in a fine soprano voice which moved nurses in the room to tears.
Soul, Seoul, ha ha, very funny.
>Becky Scruton took an airport limousine to Kennedy for a flight to Korea on Saturday, Aug. 27. There she found that she had neglected to bring her passport, and she booked passage on Tuesdays flight instead.
"John Oldham":
>Oldham, 27, a recent law-school graduate, was booked to fly on Monday night but postponed his trip for 24 hours so he could help some visiting Chinese scholars to find housing near New Yorks Columbia University.
"Han Tae Park":
>On the day of the flight, in fact, Park had asked Chung to take a walk with him. To my surprise, he talked about dying, remembers Chung. He told me that the most dreadful thing would be to die in a plane crash because in that kind of an accident, even though you were in danger, you cant do anything.
"Jan Hjalmarsson":
>A globe-trotting Swedish entrepreneur who lived in Queens, N.Y., Hjalmarsson, 38, was originally booked on a flight scheduled to leave New York at 5 p.m. When he discovered that Flight 007 would take off seven hours later yet arrive in Seoul at almost the same time, he eagerly changed his reservation.
PART 1
R: 5 / I: 1
t. the autist formerly known as Varg Vikernes
P.S. don't look up pictures of my father since they don't at all look like pic related and there's nothing suspicious about my ancestry whatsoever.
A MESSAGE FROM OUR COMMANDER VAG
Redheads are half niggers, the average Oyrish looks like this.t. the autist formerly known as Varg Vikernes
P.S. don't look up pictures of my father since they don't at all look like pic related and there's nothing suspicious about my ancestry whatsoever.
R: 54 / I: 14
>OK Corral shootout - although supposedly taking place on the 26th of October 1881, this event evidently wasn't even known about until 1931, and many images of the people involved in it are simply fabricated
>Gleiwitz incident and the various Polish-German border clashes - whether it was instigated by Naujocks or not, it was clearly faked to instigate the invasion of Poland, with no deaths on either side
>Columbine shootings - suspicious date (4/20 in US format), fake surveillance footage. The jewish shooter Dylan Dylan Klebold was even born on 9/11 1981.
>9/11 - pretty obvious, though it's in its own category, to keep it simple, there were no planes striking the WTC, and many of the main "victims" presented were in on the hoax and as are most "survivors". Al-Qaeda was a complete CIA/MI6/Mossad operation from top-to-down ("headed" by the CIA asset and Yemeni jew Osama bin Laden) that still assisted fighters in Bosnia and Chechnya a few years earlier. The 1993 WTC bombing was likely fake entirely, and it's also probable that the "Arab" celebrations of the attack were also instigated by undercover Mossad agents to legitimise the event and create more antagonism
>Sandy Hook - often called "Sandy Hooknose", virtually everything about the event is completely fabricated, the school itself (named Sandy Hook after a random Dutch settlement in NJ for some reason, despite being in Connecticut) was likely a complete ghost building, and there were no real emotional feelings among the parents; there's probably more "truthers" pushing misdirection about the shooting than there are people trying to debunk it, seeing as it's so obviously fake.
To add to the bit on Sandy Hook; "Sandy Hook" was referenced in the background in the Dark Knight Rises, the same movie where another fake shooting occurred in Aurora Colorado (giving it a Lincoln-assassination-like meta-narrative, since his assassination was initially thought of to be part of the play, same thing applies here) and it turns out major events of the year coincide with hurricane naming themes: "Hurricane Sandy" in the east coast went from October to the 2nd of November in 2012, and "Sandy" Hook, also in a coastal region in Connecticut just happens to follow that a month later (taking place during hanukkah nevertheless, which seems to be a theme for jewish-led ops). Similarly in 2017, the Harvey Weinstein revelation (which is likely a controlled demolition to distract from other, equally bad jewish pedophiles) took place a month after "Hurricane Harvey" in Texas.
Fake events thread
Often in the media, figures are fabricated or stolen for one-off uses, and events are simply made up, the motive typically to provide a pretext for a certain political action occurring. To give some obvious examples of events that are known to be fake (although these are not the only ones, these are the ones most likely to be fake):>OK Corral shootout - although supposedly taking place on the 26th of October 1881, this event evidently wasn't even known about until 1931, and many images of the people involved in it are simply fabricated
>Gleiwitz incident and the various Polish-German border clashes - whether it was instigated by Naujocks or not, it was clearly faked to instigate the invasion of Poland, with no deaths on either side
>Columbine shootings - suspicious date (4/20 in US format), fake surveillance footage. The jewish shooter Dylan Dylan Klebold was even born on 9/11 1981.
>9/11 - pretty obvious, though it's in its own category, to keep it simple, there were no planes striking the WTC, and many of the main "victims" presented were in on the hoax and as are most "survivors". Al-Qaeda was a complete CIA/MI6/Mossad operation from top-to-down ("headed" by the CIA asset and Yemeni jew Osama bin Laden) that still assisted fighters in Bosnia and Chechnya a few years earlier. The 1993 WTC bombing was likely fake entirely, and it's also probable that the "Arab" celebrations of the attack were also instigated by undercover Mossad agents to legitimise the event and create more antagonism
>Sandy Hook - often called "Sandy Hooknose", virtually everything about the event is completely fabricated, the school itself (named Sandy Hook after a random Dutch settlement in NJ for some reason, despite being in Connecticut) was likely a complete ghost building, and there were no real emotional feelings among the parents; there's probably more "truthers" pushing misdirection about the shooting than there are people trying to debunk it, seeing as it's so obviously fake.
To add to the bit on Sandy Hook; "Sandy Hook" was referenced in the background in the Dark Knight Rises, the same movie where another fake shooting occurred in Aurora Colorado (giving it a Lincoln-assassination-like meta-narrative, since his assassination was initially thought of to be part of the play, same thing applies here) and it turns out major events of the year coincide with hurricane naming themes: "Hurricane Sandy" in the east coast went from October to the 2nd of November in 2012, and "Sandy" Hook, also in a coastal region in Connecticut just happens to follow that a month later (taking place during hanukkah nevertheless, which seems to be a theme for jewish-led ops). Similarly in 2017, the Harvey Weinstein revelation (which is likely a controlled demolition to distract from other, equally bad jewish pedophiles) took place a month after "Hurricane Harvey" in Texas.
R: 56 / I: 9
Don't get me wrong, feds are enemies, but although they're technically working for an alphabet agency, they're still low-tier ZOGbots, many of them not even aware of the full picture, and by directing intention towards law-enforcement agencies instead of intelligence agencies, genuine nationalists are going to be dissuaded by even the thought that these faux-nationalist figures are part of black-ops to blackwash real nationalists, since it gives the implication that Richard Spencer is just infiltrating a legitimate, organic white nationalist movement and then turning it into a honeypot, and not already operating off spook-owned think-tanks, which Spencer was (see his involvement in the "American Conservative" and "Taki's Magazine"). Often, suspicions of people being "feds" come from spook-owned outlets. Telegram is a known spyware chat-service ridden with these types of outlets, often openly spied on (or perhaps owned) by the ADL:
http://archive.fo/i9gcB
>Some Telegram channel administrators appear to recognize the inflammatory and racist nature of the content they are hosting and seem to have accepted the possibility that law enforcement is monitoring these channels. These administrators attempt to undermine gravity or intent with disclaimers of sorts. For example, the description for the Holocaust II channel reads, A sequel based on the original folk tale. These are jokes and memes, you kike puppet fed retards. The GAS | ME | DADDY channel description offers this greeting: HELLO SPLC, IM BACK!! (NOTE FOR FEDS: All rhetoric expressed on this channel is purely harmless rhetoric, and should not be interpreted as amounting to any kind of threat.) And on the RapeWaffen Division channel, where posters advocate for violent rape, the description reads Rape War Soon! Prepare! Note for feds: Complete satire. HAIL METH 1690 HAIL RAPE 1589HAIL CRACK 1230 HAIL AIDS 1776.
Filled with "notes for feds" are they? No "notes for Mossad", or notes for any other intel group, it's all fearmongering over law enforcement coming to get them, which if they aren't genuine, they won't and aren't because they operate above the law.
During the supposed Poway synagogue event (admittedly nearly nobody died except the rabbi, footage only came out months after the event supposedly happened, plus John Earnest was probably a phantom based on a previous spook in the same area, named "John Friend"), the FBI was openly in on posting stuff on 8/pol/, and even revealed that. In their printed documents of an 8chan thread, there's a (you) showing that whoever printed that out posted positively about Earnest in that thread, and also posted several other things, accusing him of being Russian intel, having ties to the "Tarrant's lads" group (another one of those controlled Telegram groups, which doesn't even make sense since it's Ukrainian), among other things such as posting cancerous memes (e.g. "Kek" and the "Honk Honk" gibberish). It's probable that that wasn't just a mistake, and it was intentional, simply to both legitimise the Earnest shooting (by having an actual FBI operative try to discredit it) and to make it look like feds were infiltrating 8chan, ignoring that its moderation were openly spooks, and that they were allowing the legitimisation of Tarrant and John Earnest.
There's also the term "glownigger". It has its roots in the statement "CIAniggers glow in the dark", by Terry Davis, the author of TempleOS and an extremely weird character himself. He has been alleged to have been an actor faking schizophrenia, and has done extremely disgusting stuff before, including masturbating live on camera. Despite being around well before then, specifically around 2013, he was propagated on /g/ just a year or two before his supposed death. Ever since then, "glowing" has become a word used by shills not to describe intel agencies manipulating dissidents, but to describe feds trying to "infiltrate" these already fraudulent movements.
The op within an op - "fedposting"
I've noticed recently that even among normal faux-nationalist circles (namely posters on 4/8chan as well as mainstream websites like Twitter), figures like Richard Spencer and co. are now openly admitted to be enemy agents. Of course, other known spook outlets have went after him as a spook as well (namely "renegade tribune"), but I have hardly seen any non-judeoleftist actually fall for the Spencer op in recent months. However, this seems to be intentional, as another meta-psyop. Why? Because the term "fed" or "fedposter" is used to describe these types of people, obviously referring to the American FBI, or law enforcement, essentially meaning that people like Spencer are simply informants trying to bait nationalists to expressing extreme views so that they can be arrested. This is likely intentional psychological manipulation to drive away attention from intelligence agencies and their real goal with faux-nationalists to begin with, and to legitimise other faux-nationalists as a persecuted group.Don't get me wrong, feds are enemies, but although they're technically working for an alphabet agency, they're still low-tier ZOGbots, many of them not even aware of the full picture, and by directing intention towards law-enforcement agencies instead of intelligence agencies, genuine nationalists are going to be dissuaded by even the thought that these faux-nationalist figures are part of black-ops to blackwash real nationalists, since it gives the implication that Richard Spencer is just infiltrating a legitimate, organic white nationalist movement and then turning it into a honeypot, and not already operating off spook-owned think-tanks, which Spencer was (see his involvement in the "American Conservative" and "Taki's Magazine"). Often, suspicions of people being "feds" come from spook-owned outlets. Telegram is a known spyware chat-service ridden with these types of outlets, often openly spied on (or perhaps owned) by the ADL:
http://archive.fo/i9gcB
>Some Telegram channel administrators appear to recognize the inflammatory and racist nature of the content they are hosting and seem to have accepted the possibility that law enforcement is monitoring these channels. These administrators attempt to undermine gravity or intent with disclaimers of sorts. For example, the description for the Holocaust II channel reads, A sequel based on the original folk tale. These are jokes and memes, you kike puppet fed retards. The GAS | ME | DADDY channel description offers this greeting: HELLO SPLC, IM BACK!! (NOTE FOR FEDS: All rhetoric expressed on this channel is purely harmless rhetoric, and should not be interpreted as amounting to any kind of threat.) And on the RapeWaffen Division channel, where posters advocate for violent rape, the description reads Rape War Soon! Prepare! Note for feds: Complete satire. HAIL METH 1690 HAIL RAPE 1589HAIL CRACK 1230 HAIL AIDS 1776.
Filled with "notes for feds" are they? No "notes for Mossad", or notes for any other intel group, it's all fearmongering over law enforcement coming to get them, which if they aren't genuine, they won't and aren't because they operate above the law.
During the supposed Poway synagogue event (admittedly nearly nobody died except the rabbi, footage only came out months after the event supposedly happened, plus John Earnest was probably a phantom based on a previous spook in the same area, named "John Friend"), the FBI was openly in on posting stuff on 8/pol/, and even revealed that. In their printed documents of an 8chan thread, there's a (you) showing that whoever printed that out posted positively about Earnest in that thread, and also posted several other things, accusing him of being Russian intel, having ties to the "Tarrant's lads" group (another one of those controlled Telegram groups, which doesn't even make sense since it's Ukrainian), among other things such as posting cancerous memes (e.g. "Kek" and the "Honk Honk" gibberish). It's probable that that wasn't just a mistake, and it was intentional, simply to both legitimise the Earnest shooting (by having an actual FBI operative try to discredit it) and to make it look like feds were infiltrating 8chan, ignoring that its moderation were openly spooks, and that they were allowing the legitimisation of Tarrant and John Earnest.
There's also the term "glownigger". It has its roots in the statement "CIAniggers glow in the dark", by Terry Davis, the author of TempleOS and an extremely weird character himself. He has been alleged to have been an actor faking schizophrenia, and has done extremely disgusting stuff before, including masturbating live on camera. Despite being around well before then, specifically around 2013, he was propagated on /g/ just a year or two before his supposed death. Ever since then, "glowing" has become a word used by shills not to describe intel agencies manipulating dissidents, but to describe feds trying to "infiltrate" these already fraudulent movements.
R: 49 / I: 6
Unironically? That jews hate jesus. That jews are magically repelled by jesus. Like all of the most effective shill campaigns, there's truth to it, but it's skewed in a way that it looks convincing to the hopelessly delusional.
Here's the basis of it. Some jews do hate jesus, and they're the orthodox jews. The equivalent of the amish in Israel do, because that's part of the LARP - what crossposting christian posters accuse everyone they don't like of doing. These jews are called the Haredim. They represent approximately 12% of all jews in Israel, but their political power is such that every candidate has to pander to them if they want their votes.
But wait you might be thinking, explain the kikel backstory and the no cross signs on keyboards and in the classrooms? First you should take a second to realize that even taken as whole, that's not enough to rationalize the shill narrative. After that, Haredim at different intervals have immigrated to the US. This is such that the kikel story is such an isolated incident that even going by the christian crosspoter story, it should be at least at the level of muslims hating pork. It isn't. You now realize the kikel story is virtually the entire basis of that narrative and always the first thing that gets posted.
After that, the rest falls apart. Israeli keyboards do contain a plus sign. The reason why? Haredim like the Amish abstain from electronics. This means the JIDF have no upbringing that would make them subsconsiously wary of LARPing like a christian. The challenge in Israel with dealing with autistic LARPers is containing different sets of classroom material since like the Amish the Haredim have different curriculum. The Haredim utilize the tactic of uprooting themselves and going to a different part of a city or Israel to change political favor, so sign makers must change the signs' contents based on their movements or lose business.
If any of that seems inconsequential, it actually should. That was the entire basis of the above myth. Christian crossposters want to sell you on that story, that dismantling it seems underwhelming. But the story doesn't end there. There's a reason why I'm posting this here and not in its own thread.
It's a retarded narrative for a very big reason. Why is it that after 2016 there was a massive surge of christian posting? Why did they try to convince /pol/ to go back to worshiping jews? For the same reason as many faux-advocates, it's to lead you back into the proverbial cave. If you focus your entire message based around jews hating christianity and worshiping them all the same, what separates you from conservatives? Christianity being inherently zionistic, and conservatives being a largely zionist demographic - they successfully tricked you into repeating the past mistake of the last generation.
Overall, the idea that you will somehow stop jews by worshiping them ala Chrsitianity was in itself a trap and a return to the controlled opposition. That in itself exemplifie the jewish inverse of truth, the quintessential jewish lie. If you have learned anything about jewish shills, you should have learned that they possess no boundaries. They're the same people prone to degenerate behavior just by genetics alone, why would you ever think they'd be afraid of a rabbi who is center to the religion that let them out of the desert?
If all of that fails to register with you, ponder on this: What do jews benefit more from? Convincing /pol/ to be christian? Or convincing /pol/ to not be christian? If you studied the practical uses of christianity from the 300s all the way throughout the medieval times, you should know the answer. Better yet, if you realized that that question wasn't a pagan/athiest versus christian statement, now you're aware of the false dichotomy they set you up with once you start criticizing christianity.
Stop worshiping jews.
The "Jews hate Jesus" trope
(copied from an 8kun post concerning deliberately bad conspiracy theories)Unironically? That jews hate jesus. That jews are magically repelled by jesus. Like all of the most effective shill campaigns, there's truth to it, but it's skewed in a way that it looks convincing to the hopelessly delusional.
Here's the basis of it. Some jews do hate jesus, and they're the orthodox jews. The equivalent of the amish in Israel do, because that's part of the LARP - what crossposting christian posters accuse everyone they don't like of doing. These jews are called the Haredim. They represent approximately 12% of all jews in Israel, but their political power is such that every candidate has to pander to them if they want their votes.
But wait you might be thinking, explain the kikel backstory and the no cross signs on keyboards and in the classrooms? First you should take a second to realize that even taken as whole, that's not enough to rationalize the shill narrative. After that, Haredim at different intervals have immigrated to the US. This is such that the kikel story is such an isolated incident that even going by the christian crosspoter story, it should be at least at the level of muslims hating pork. It isn't. You now realize the kikel story is virtually the entire basis of that narrative and always the first thing that gets posted.
After that, the rest falls apart. Israeli keyboards do contain a plus sign. The reason why? Haredim like the Amish abstain from electronics. This means the JIDF have no upbringing that would make them subsconsiously wary of LARPing like a christian. The challenge in Israel with dealing with autistic LARPers is containing different sets of classroom material since like the Amish the Haredim have different curriculum. The Haredim utilize the tactic of uprooting themselves and going to a different part of a city or Israel to change political favor, so sign makers must change the signs' contents based on their movements or lose business.
If any of that seems inconsequential, it actually should. That was the entire basis of the above myth. Christian crossposters want to sell you on that story, that dismantling it seems underwhelming. But the story doesn't end there. There's a reason why I'm posting this here and not in its own thread.
It's a retarded narrative for a very big reason. Why is it that after 2016 there was a massive surge of christian posting? Why did they try to convince /pol/ to go back to worshiping jews? For the same reason as many faux-advocates, it's to lead you back into the proverbial cave. If you focus your entire message based around jews hating christianity and worshiping them all the same, what separates you from conservatives? Christianity being inherently zionistic, and conservatives being a largely zionist demographic - they successfully tricked you into repeating the past mistake of the last generation.
Overall, the idea that you will somehow stop jews by worshiping them ala Chrsitianity was in itself a trap and a return to the controlled opposition. That in itself exemplifie the jewish inverse of truth, the quintessential jewish lie. If you have learned anything about jewish shills, you should have learned that they possess no boundaries. They're the same people prone to degenerate behavior just by genetics alone, why would you ever think they'd be afraid of a rabbi who is center to the religion that let them out of the desert?
If all of that fails to register with you, ponder on this: What do jews benefit more from? Convincing /pol/ to be christian? Or convincing /pol/ to not be christian? If you studied the practical uses of christianity from the 300s all the way throughout the medieval times, you should know the answer. Better yet, if you realized that that question wasn't a pagan/athiest versus christian statement, now you're aware of the false dichotomy they set you up with once you start criticizing christianity.
Stop worshiping jews.
R: 5 / I: 1
I think the fact James Mason is associated with satanism in anyway makes him wholly unlikeable.
I think the fact James Mason is associated with satanism in anyway makes him wholly unlikeable.
R: 1 / I: 0
Is corporal punishment appropriate and in what amounts?
Should it be allowed in schools? for adults too? in prison?
Is corporal punishment appropriate and in what amounts?
Should it be allowed in schools? for adults too? in prison?
R: 2 / I: 0
Why is New Mexico so libertarian?
Why is New Mexico so libertarian?
R: 7 / I: 4
So I tried taking the LeftValues quiz as a National Socialist...
So I tried taking the LeftValues quiz as a National Socialist...
R: 0 / I: 0
>You could prevent them from being rebellious or a threat to you in the future by ordering the following steps: prohibit them from possessing weapons of war, order them to wear tunics under their cloaks and soft boots, instruct them to play the lyre and the harp, and tell them to educate their sons to be shopkeepers. If you do this, sire, you will soon see that they will become women instead of men and thus will then pose no danger or threat to you of any future rebellion."
This stood out to me in my recent read-through of Herodotus because of how on-the-nose it is compared with tactics of modern globalists. I knew this means of subjugation was as old as time, but it's strange to see it spelled out in such plain language.
Now I am interested in seeing more examples like this. I'm not looking for theories or even examples of this tactic in action. I want to see writers and (especially) political leaders describing this tactic deliberately enough that it can be paralleled with modern feminization tactics going on now. It could be useful to construct a timeline or essay of feminizing the men of a population and of the consequences, which I'm sure are always pacification and a crack-down on liberties.
Subjugation by Feminization in History
Croesus to King Cyrus on how to deal with the rebellious Lydians:>You could prevent them from being rebellious or a threat to you in the future by ordering the following steps: prohibit them from possessing weapons of war, order them to wear tunics under their cloaks and soft boots, instruct them to play the lyre and the harp, and tell them to educate their sons to be shopkeepers. If you do this, sire, you will soon see that they will become women instead of men and thus will then pose no danger or threat to you of any future rebellion."
This stood out to me in my recent read-through of Herodotus because of how on-the-nose it is compared with tactics of modern globalists. I knew this means of subjugation was as old as time, but it's strange to see it spelled out in such plain language.
Now I am interested in seeing more examples like this. I'm not looking for theories or even examples of this tactic in action. I want to see writers and (especially) political leaders describing this tactic deliberately enough that it can be paralleled with modern feminization tactics going on now. It could be useful to construct a timeline or essay of feminizing the men of a population and of the consequences, which I'm sure are always pacification and a crack-down on liberties.
R: 15 / I: 0
Learning a new language
Which foreign language is best worth my time learning? Is Duolingo a worthwhile tool, or is it ineffective? It was founded by the jew Luis von Ahn and pushes social engineering like CalArts style pictures of nonwhites and homosexual sentences, but it is free and one of the most widely used programs.
R: 12 / I: 1
4chan ban
With a recent attack on internet free speech following the coronavirus pandemic and massive corporate sponsored BLM protests, many people are speculating that 4chan will be shutdown in the coming weeks to months. Where will everybody go? How well known is this site? I would like this site to be at least semi active, at least half way of 8chan levels, but it would be a shame if redditors are to override this site.
R: 2 / I: 0
Not enough people talk about the Esau gambit, and even less people really choose to extend it to known false dialectics like national socialism and fascism, let alone zionism. This idea of jewish thesis (Zionism) vs. jewish "antithesis" (international jewry) is forced so much and opposed in such a clown-like manner (by national-socialists or other shills pretending to be white nationalists, as well as false "truthers" like Miles Mathis and the lot) that it effectively functions as a jewish ouroboros. If you're an intellectual and don't want to be chased by the organised jewish mafia, you either have to be a gerrymander for Zionism or you have to be a gerrymander for international jewry. However, I don't believe this is an attempt to keep up the current left-right dialectic (since it already has been run to the ground), it's an attempt to divide anti-Zionists from Europe and the Arab world for making a difference, by crippling opposition to both racial jewry as a whole and of Zionism.
They'll push Putin as some "saviour of Syria" despite the fact that not only is he in cahoots with Netanyahu, but also with a massive jewish oligarchy in Russia itself. Assad will never actually attack Israel despite the fact that it's right across the border and holds Syrian land (which is a point of discussion in-itself, Assad's father was likely put in charge of Syria by Israeli spooks as a double-agent, so that they could "win" the 6-days-war). A similar situation in the Levant to that of the west is among the Lebanese Maronites, who supposedly admire fascism (the name of their party "Kataeb" literally means "Phalange"), and are extremely servile to Israel, even helping them occupy southern Lebanon before they were stabbed in the back.
An even more nonsensical situation is Libya, divided between the UN-recognised government, the "Government of National Accords", and the Haftar clique. Apparently Turkey supports the GNA, Russia and the UAE support the Haftar clique (Haftar was actually initially trained in the USSR itself), and Israel has been alleged to support both, which basically puts Haftar in an Assad-situation of sorts.
Meanwhile in Europe, African migrants are coming to Italy through Libya en masse and are all said to have support from Soros-funded NGOs or other low-tier boogeymen. Since Israel "opposes" Soros (they really don't), all these civic-nationalist, pro-LGBT and "anti-Islam" parties are amping up their Zionist rhetoric tenfold, acting in a similar position to the Maronites before them though typically far more "anti-fascist" and accepting of homosexualisation and negrification, and even as you go deeper there are "neo-fascists" that despite formally being opposed to Zionism, are negrified and exhibit pro-homosexual attitudes (CasaPound), have links to Putin (Dritte Weg and CasaPound by extension of their links to Syria, as well as the "NRM" in Sweden, said to formally receive training from the RF) or have links to fake agency-instigated-terrorist "attacks" (the "assassination" of Walter Lubcke by Stephan Ernst, tied to C18, a British "terrorist" group itself tied to the Dritte Weg, a German "neo-fascist party" that itself supposedly has ties to the Assad regime in Syria)
Overall, the entire geopolitical situation in the middle-east and Europe is strangled in a jewish ouroboros of sorts. Nearly every single portal leads to some sort of Zionist-agenda, and not enough people get this.
The international Esau gambit
Has anyone noticed how while many faux-nationalist groups, both contemporary and historical (including the NSDAP itself with the Haavara agreement despite statements to the contrary in Mein Kampf, as well as Mussolini being a fervent Zionist) advocate the jews to all go back to Israel so they wouldn't have to deal with them in Europe, whereas Arab "anti-Zionists" all happen to consider the jews only invaders in the middle east, and only want to deport them to Europe (despite the fact that they're racially distinct from both Europeans and other Semites)?Not enough people talk about the Esau gambit, and even less people really choose to extend it to known false dialectics like national socialism and fascism, let alone zionism. This idea of jewish thesis (Zionism) vs. jewish "antithesis" (international jewry) is forced so much and opposed in such a clown-like manner (by national-socialists or other shills pretending to be white nationalists, as well as false "truthers" like Miles Mathis and the lot) that it effectively functions as a jewish ouroboros. If you're an intellectual and don't want to be chased by the organised jewish mafia, you either have to be a gerrymander for Zionism or you have to be a gerrymander for international jewry. However, I don't believe this is an attempt to keep up the current left-right dialectic (since it already has been run to the ground), it's an attempt to divide anti-Zionists from Europe and the Arab world for making a difference, by crippling opposition to both racial jewry as a whole and of Zionism.
They'll push Putin as some "saviour of Syria" despite the fact that not only is he in cahoots with Netanyahu, but also with a massive jewish oligarchy in Russia itself. Assad will never actually attack Israel despite the fact that it's right across the border and holds Syrian land (which is a point of discussion in-itself, Assad's father was likely put in charge of Syria by Israeli spooks as a double-agent, so that they could "win" the 6-days-war). A similar situation in the Levant to that of the west is among the Lebanese Maronites, who supposedly admire fascism (the name of their party "Kataeb" literally means "Phalange"), and are extremely servile to Israel, even helping them occupy southern Lebanon before they were stabbed in the back.
An even more nonsensical situation is Libya, divided between the UN-recognised government, the "Government of National Accords", and the Haftar clique. Apparently Turkey supports the GNA, Russia and the UAE support the Haftar clique (Haftar was actually initially trained in the USSR itself), and Israel has been alleged to support both, which basically puts Haftar in an Assad-situation of sorts.
Meanwhile in Europe, African migrants are coming to Italy through Libya en masse and are all said to have support from Soros-funded NGOs or other low-tier boogeymen. Since Israel "opposes" Soros (they really don't), all these civic-nationalist, pro-LGBT and "anti-Islam" parties are amping up their Zionist rhetoric tenfold, acting in a similar position to the Maronites before them though typically far more "anti-fascist" and accepting of homosexualisation and negrification, and even as you go deeper there are "neo-fascists" that despite formally being opposed to Zionism, are negrified and exhibit pro-homosexual attitudes (CasaPound), have links to Putin (Dritte Weg and CasaPound by extension of their links to Syria, as well as the "NRM" in Sweden, said to formally receive training from the RF) or have links to fake agency-instigated-terrorist "attacks" (the "assassination" of Walter Lubcke by Stephan Ernst, tied to C18, a British "terrorist" group itself tied to the Dritte Weg, a German "neo-fascist party" that itself supposedly has ties to the Assad regime in Syria)
Overall, the entire geopolitical situation in the middle-east and Europe is strangled in a jewish ouroboros of sorts. Nearly every single portal leads to some sort of Zionist-agenda, and not enough people get this.
R: 33 / I: 2
How much longer until it becomes legal to enslave White people in America?
https://nationalvanguard.org/2020/06/its-never-been-about-fairness/
How much longer until it becomes legal to enslave White people in America?
https://nationalvanguard.org/2020/06/its-never-been-about-fairness/
R: 2 / I: 0
Solzhenitsyn supposedly moved to Cologne and then the USA (which I always saw as an odd thing; why move to the USA, a country so far away from Russia instead of staying in Germany?), and moved back to Russia after his citizenship was restored under Gorbachev. Notice that his citizenship was restored under Gorbachev, not under the RF, of course, since the RSFR and the RF are the same entity. After this, he wrote his latest books such as "Russia in Collapse" and "200 years together". In his 1998 title "Russia in Collapse" he actually criticises anti-jewish and anti-masonic Russian nationalist groups.
Either way, in "200 years together", he still used the typical trick of making it look like some strong, nationalist Tsarist Russia that repressed the jews for centuries was overthrown by the jews and replaced with communism, when in-reality, many Tsars were quite friendly to them, both before and after the Partition of Poland, and the Russian empire was internationalist.
Some may point out that he looked jewish, but he actually looked more like a Finn or Chuvash, despite his family being from Ukraine; so I suppose he might be of Tatar descent? A jewish origin might be possible as well, though there isn't much information surrounding his jewish background. His surname is weird too, it's explained as meaning "malter":
>Alexander Solzhenitsyn’s family name comes from the term for the profession of malt processing. Traditionally, Solzhenitsywould have been “malters” who cultivated and dried malt.
Suspicious things about Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn
In light of both discussion on how the Romanovs, at least at the time of the 20th century (if not before that, as Peter I's prime minister was a jew) were, if not racially jewish servile to world jewry, and how the Korean Airlines 007 incident, involving the Soviets and Americans wasn't real, Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn's works and character should be taken into question. He's essentially the Russian equivalent of Orwell, both being former communists that later came to despise it and write literature against it; one of the most notable ones for now is his comment on the Bolsheviks being jews in his relatively recent work "Two Hundred Years Together". It's often quoted in faux-nationalist outlets such as Incogman, Smoloko/Shlomoko, Christogenea, 8/pol/ during its heyday, and various others, right next to the mulatto pederast Michael Jackson's music video "They don't really care about us" and General Patton's quote on the jews or about how they should've went for Russia instead. Now, Patton is the departure point for the main reason why Solzhenitsyn is suspicious: he was given "honourary US citizenship" by Larry McDonald, a relative of Patton whom supposedly died in the Korean Airlines 007 incident (more on that here: >>1054). He was also given a Nobel Peace Prize in 1970, another red flag, since Nobel prizes are typically given by jews to their fellow jews when they plagiarise or accomplish virtually nothing; essentially a less obvious version of jewish knighthood. He was supposedly in a gulag for 8 years, but he was using others' stories to describe it (was he really a prisoner in the gulag?) but at the same time, he was a friend of an incredibly suspicious character known as "Lev Kopelev". He was a jewish intel officer and former-Trotskyite supposedly interred in 1945 for criticising the atrocities of the USSR, released in 1954, and moved to Cologne just like Solzhenitsyn did, despite still being a communist. So one of his friends in the gulag was a jew, go figure.Solzhenitsyn supposedly moved to Cologne and then the USA (which I always saw as an odd thing; why move to the USA, a country so far away from Russia instead of staying in Germany?), and moved back to Russia after his citizenship was restored under Gorbachev. Notice that his citizenship was restored under Gorbachev, not under the RF, of course, since the RSFR and the RF are the same entity. After this, he wrote his latest books such as "Russia in Collapse" and "200 years together". In his 1998 title "Russia in Collapse" he actually criticises anti-jewish and anti-masonic Russian nationalist groups.
Either way, in "200 years together", he still used the typical trick of making it look like some strong, nationalist Tsarist Russia that repressed the jews for centuries was overthrown by the jews and replaced with communism, when in-reality, many Tsars were quite friendly to them, both before and after the Partition of Poland, and the Russian empire was internationalist.
Some may point out that he looked jewish, but he actually looked more like a Finn or Chuvash, despite his family being from Ukraine; so I suppose he might be of Tatar descent? A jewish origin might be possible as well, though there isn't much information surrounding his jewish background. His surname is weird too, it's explained as meaning "malter":
>Alexander Solzhenitsyn’s family name comes from the term for the profession of malt processing. Traditionally, Solzhenitsywould have been “malters” who cultivated and dried malt.
R: 70 / I: 11
This could spell the end of the human race. There's a 10% chance that we're all dead by 2021.
I may never acquire the success in life I know I can have, just because someone wanted to win the election again.
Bummer.
this is fucked
Our president is starting a war just for the votes. Only it's not the same as last time. The "war on terror" wasn't too bad. This is Iran. They've got allies. Their allies have nukes. They probably have nukes. Realistically, how unlikely is it that our CIA is blissfully anaware? If this escalates, it could literally spell the end of the world. No joke. This isn't about attacking sand niggers anymore. This is really, really bad. There's two ways this could go. We don't escalate, it's fine. Or, we escalate, shit hits the fan, and inevitably, nukes start flying. I don't know exactly what weapons world war 3 will be fought with, but world war 4 will be fought with rocks.This could spell the end of the human race. There's a 10% chance that we're all dead by 2021.
I may never acquire the success in life I know I can have, just because someone wanted to win the election again.
Bummer.
R: 20 / I: 1
One day...
One day...
R: 8 / I: 3
The theory that the term is allegedly from Ashkenazi (though Ashkenazi is Aschkenasi in German) is a longstanding one, though it was on controlled opposition sites that also made up a lot of gobbledygook alongside it. I remember coming across the idea and dismissing it many years ago just because of all the other crud the websites were peddling (I guess I wasn't as discerning back then) and thinking that it was too obvious of a reference. Well, considering all of the other in-your-face symbolism they push, I have actually taken the AshkeNazi theory into better consideration. It could be derived from the spelling of Ashkenazi in English and other languages, but given a German pronunciation (z = ts in German). Ashkenazim are said to have originated in the Rhineland.
Nazi/Natzi was also a nickname for Ignaz/Ignatz, and either the nickname or proper name or both was/were considered to be the early 20th Bavarian equivalent to Cletus or Billybob in the modern US, i.e. an unsophisticated hick. The NSDAP originated in Munich (officially at least; it may very well have had multiple international hands in its making, which could also tie in to 'Ashkenazi').
So, 'Nazi' could have had a double entendre: AshkeNazi for the elite of the NSDAP, and IgNazi for the lower level proles. The sound of the word also fits in the German pronunciation of National (like nahtsionahl); while the NSDAP was said to have rejected the term Nazi, Goebbels did use it in his Nazi-Sozi speech.
1. Ashkenazi
2. Ignatz
3. German pronunciation of Nationalsozialist
The origin of "Nazi"
In light of information indicating numerous little and big red flags about the NSDAP, such as how many of its members looked jewish (Naujocks, Heydrich, Eichmann, Goebbels (though he's written off as merely having a Med/Dinaric phenotype), etc.), Hebrew symbolism in the Waffen-SS, NS antagonism towards non-German Europeans, the NS usage of the hammer and sickle, portraying admitted jews and mischlings as poster Aryans, jewish girlfriends/mentors in notable NSDAP members' early lives, Eichmann 'fleeing' to heavily jewish Buenos Aires, etc., could the term "Nazi" also be a red flag?The theory that the term is allegedly from Ashkenazi (though Ashkenazi is Aschkenasi in German) is a longstanding one, though it was on controlled opposition sites that also made up a lot of gobbledygook alongside it. I remember coming across the idea and dismissing it many years ago just because of all the other crud the websites were peddling (I guess I wasn't as discerning back then) and thinking that it was too obvious of a reference. Well, considering all of the other in-your-face symbolism they push, I have actually taken the AshkeNazi theory into better consideration. It could be derived from the spelling of Ashkenazi in English and other languages, but given a German pronunciation (z = ts in German). Ashkenazim are said to have originated in the Rhineland.
Nazi/Natzi was also a nickname for Ignaz/Ignatz, and either the nickname or proper name or both was/were considered to be the early 20th Bavarian equivalent to Cletus or Billybob in the modern US, i.e. an unsophisticated hick. The NSDAP originated in Munich (officially at least; it may very well have had multiple international hands in its making, which could also tie in to 'Ashkenazi').
So, 'Nazi' could have had a double entendre: AshkeNazi for the elite of the NSDAP, and IgNazi for the lower level proles. The sound of the word also fits in the German pronunciation of National (like nahtsionahl); while the NSDAP was said to have rejected the term Nazi, Goebbels did use it in his Nazi-Sozi speech.
1. Ashkenazi
2. Ignatz
3. German pronunciation of Nationalsozialist
R: 21 / I: 1
Our countries today are not even the same countries they were fifteen years ago. The level of depravity, insanity, anti-white strife, sexual perversions, and societal cowardice are far higher now than probably ever in recorded history. Some countries are more extreme than the others, and even within countries some regions are more extreme than the others, but when reflecting on the rate of corrosion, no evidence shows that the jewish zeitgeist is going to miss the currently more normal and psychologically healthier areas of the West in the next twenty years.
I'll get to Europe and elsewhere, but first, let's discuss the morality of putting more white children in modern America.
Let's say you grew up in California. Contrary to what kosher conservatives say, (white) Californians overwhelmingly voted in favor of anti-illegal immigration and anti-affirmative action measures when they were on the ballot up until the 2000s. But because the Sanhedrin-style court system constantly overturned such measures even when passed by popular vote, such actions to stem the rising tide of mud and were never able to take place. Because California has become so rundown with the highest cost of living and taxation in the country, the white working class leaves in droves throughout the late 1980s to the early 2010s rather than actually standing up for themselves and fighting back somehow. All of the jews and their brown techie golem moving into the San Francisco Bay Area and all of the illegal immigration in southern California that is never taken care of further pushes state politics into Menshevism. You stick around because you feel that running away like the rest would be a cowardly move, but eventually the cost of living and lack of well-paying jobs that aren't tech bullshit eats into your wallet and you eventually do move away, somewhere to the Midwest, thinking you're in a white safe haven for the time being. Until you notice that the farms are all employing mestizos, Somalis, and other nonwhites, and the small white towns without the factory farms are mostly made up of the elderly and unemployed, and even there the Department of Housing and Urban Development is sending ghetto niggers and Somali "refugees" to mutt up. Like in California, the white Midwesterners just don't do anything.
Texas, once the flagship state of conservatism (and yes, that includes servility to Israel), is basically another California in the making. It already is majority nonwhite and it has moved significantly to the left in the past ten years. White Texans aren't doing anything aside from moving away with jews and their brown golem taking their place, like California (Austin in particular has become a very jewish city, currently with a jewish mayor and many israeli tech branches). Similar stories exist for Florida, Georgia, North Carolina, Virginia, Oklahoma, Nevada, and so on.
Anti-white laws and corporate policies are much more prevalent than ever before, with a one-sided judicial system. Most white Americans don't care about the hypocrisy or even support it. A significant portion of "white" Americans have substantial jewish ancestry, and this is something that goes back even to the 18th century in some cases. The US has the largest jewish population on the planet, when taking mixed jews into account (by some estimates the US has over 20 million jews and jew-mixes). Socially speaking, the US leads the West in LGBT degeneracy and anti-white sentiment. There are majority nonwhite nations that are nowhere near as anti-white as the US is today. Vaccinations are increasingly mandatory for even positions of employment. And look at how vaccines are being increasingly rushed, like the one for this COVID-19 psyop. And the schools? No need to even explain that one. And let's not get into the diet, with all the genetically modified foods and microplastics in drinking water.
So why then would you subject a newborn child to grow up in a psychologically hellish landscape?? The calm, quiet Midwest isn't going to be that way forever. And what about those who stay in the metro areas so they have a steady income? A white child born today who isn't a golem and can think critically and see through bullshit will not have a happy life. He or she will grow up in an increasingly nonwhite and tyrannical society, with levels of normalized depravity that would be shocking even to us now.
So, back to my question. Is it moral to bring forth a soul into such a corrosive culture?
(continued...)
Having White Children in Anti-White Societies
Something that has been troubling me for a while, and a matter that I've reflected upon very deeply, is the morality of bringing another soul into a depraved, hateful, thoroughly jew-run country.Our countries today are not even the same countries they were fifteen years ago. The level of depravity, insanity, anti-white strife, sexual perversions, and societal cowardice are far higher now than probably ever in recorded history. Some countries are more extreme than the others, and even within countries some regions are more extreme than the others, but when reflecting on the rate of corrosion, no evidence shows that the jewish zeitgeist is going to miss the currently more normal and psychologically healthier areas of the West in the next twenty years.
I'll get to Europe and elsewhere, but first, let's discuss the morality of putting more white children in modern America.
Let's say you grew up in California. Contrary to what kosher conservatives say, (white) Californians overwhelmingly voted in favor of anti-illegal immigration and anti-affirmative action measures when they were on the ballot up until the 2000s. But because the Sanhedrin-style court system constantly overturned such measures even when passed by popular vote, such actions to stem the rising tide of mud and were never able to take place. Because California has become so rundown with the highest cost of living and taxation in the country, the white working class leaves in droves throughout the late 1980s to the early 2010s rather than actually standing up for themselves and fighting back somehow. All of the jews and their brown techie golem moving into the San Francisco Bay Area and all of the illegal immigration in southern California that is never taken care of further pushes state politics into Menshevism. You stick around because you feel that running away like the rest would be a cowardly move, but eventually the cost of living and lack of well-paying jobs that aren't tech bullshit eats into your wallet and you eventually do move away, somewhere to the Midwest, thinking you're in a white safe haven for the time being. Until you notice that the farms are all employing mestizos, Somalis, and other nonwhites, and the small white towns without the factory farms are mostly made up of the elderly and unemployed, and even there the Department of Housing and Urban Development is sending ghetto niggers and Somali "refugees" to mutt up. Like in California, the white Midwesterners just don't do anything.
Texas, once the flagship state of conservatism (and yes, that includes servility to Israel), is basically another California in the making. It already is majority nonwhite and it has moved significantly to the left in the past ten years. White Texans aren't doing anything aside from moving away with jews and their brown golem taking their place, like California (Austin in particular has become a very jewish city, currently with a jewish mayor and many israeli tech branches). Similar stories exist for Florida, Georgia, North Carolina, Virginia, Oklahoma, Nevada, and so on.
Anti-white laws and corporate policies are much more prevalent than ever before, with a one-sided judicial system. Most white Americans don't care about the hypocrisy or even support it. A significant portion of "white" Americans have substantial jewish ancestry, and this is something that goes back even to the 18th century in some cases. The US has the largest jewish population on the planet, when taking mixed jews into account (by some estimates the US has over 20 million jews and jew-mixes). Socially speaking, the US leads the West in LGBT degeneracy and anti-white sentiment. There are majority nonwhite nations that are nowhere near as anti-white as the US is today. Vaccinations are increasingly mandatory for even positions of employment. And look at how vaccines are being increasingly rushed, like the one for this COVID-19 psyop. And the schools? No need to even explain that one. And let's not get into the diet, with all the genetically modified foods and microplastics in drinking water.
So why then would you subject a newborn child to grow up in a psychologically hellish landscape?? The calm, quiet Midwest isn't going to be that way forever. And what about those who stay in the metro areas so they have a steady income? A white child born today who isn't a golem and can think critically and see through bullshit will not have a happy life. He or she will grow up in an increasingly nonwhite and tyrannical society, with levels of normalized depravity that would be shocking even to us now.
So, back to my question. Is it moral to bring forth a soul into such a corrosive culture?
(continued...)
R: 1 / I: 0
niggers btfo
niggers btfo
R: 5 / I: 1
Never forget what they took from us.
Never forget what they took from us.
R: 6 / I: 0
Does Donald Trump actually have dementia? Been seeing this "Dementia Don" meme increase, and I have to say that there is certainly a basis for it, not just that he's a malicious jew who gets off on selling out his supporters, low IQ as they may be, but that he may literally be suffering from mental afflictions that come with age and drug abuse.
Ronald Reagan (who looked like a jew) was known to have Alzheimer's by his second term, and George W. Bush goes without explanation. Bill Clinton has been seen in recent years with a reddish nose, possibly indicating cocaine usage (which was also a rumor during his presidency).
So two candidates in 2020, both alleged to have mental afflictions. I wonder if it's actually a covert sign that the jews are ready to dump America and let it 'dry up and blow away' as Netanyahu put it.
Does Donald Trump actually have dementia? Been seeing this "Dementia Don" meme increase, and I have to say that there is certainly a basis for it, not just that he's a malicious jew who gets off on selling out his supporters, low IQ as they may be, but that he may literally be suffering from mental afflictions that come with age and drug abuse.
Ronald Reagan (who looked like a jew) was known to have Alzheimer's by his second term, and George W. Bush goes without explanation. Bill Clinton has been seen in recent years with a reddish nose, possibly indicating cocaine usage (which was also a rumor during his presidency).
So two candidates in 2020, both alleged to have mental afflictions. I wonder if it's actually a covert sign that the jews are ready to dump America and let it 'dry up and blow away' as Netanyahu put it.
R: 17 / I: 3
I personally think that it is an area that will be a wake up call to regular people, or cause a civil war.
CHAZ
What are your guys opinion on CHAZ the new "country" in America.I personally think that it is an area that will be a wake up call to regular people, or cause a civil war.
R: 1 / I: 1
Why is this territory part of WASHINGTON?
Why is this territory part of (((Washington)))? Clearly it is the rightful territory of Oregon? The territory borders the Snake river to the North, the same river that Oregon borders to its east side!!! Clearly you are mistaken if you believe this territory to be part of Washington
R: 17 / I: 3
...And it will be beautiful.
...And it will be beautiful.
R: 82 / I: 10
I wanted to discuss this actually.
1.Do you actually think black people are worse than white? Not just in one aspect or another (I think there are statistical differences, I mean black people do better at sports don't they, so why wouldn't there be other differences), but in *general*. Do you reckon it's a cultural issue, genetic, or both to some degree? How should society be in this regard?
2.Do you actually think jews are more inclined into tricking people? Do you believe people at the top (CEO's of big companies, banks and stuff) are mostly jewish? Is it gentic or cultural or both? How should society behave in this regard?
2 Bonus. What do you think of adolf hitler?
Actually I don't know if we can discuss this, 22 is hosted in germany where they are very strict about it. Maybe we shouldn't even have point two at all, mods feel free to edit this post and remove the second point if it's an issue
3. Lgbtqanlmnop, what are your thoughts? Would you really be upset with someone just because they're gay/transexual/whatever? Are transitions harmful?
Niggers, jews and trannies
We hate them only as a joke right? hahaI wanted to discuss this actually.
1.Do you actually think black people are worse than white? Not just in one aspect or another (I think there are statistical differences, I mean black people do better at sports don't they, so why wouldn't there be other differences), but in *general*. Do you reckon it's a cultural issue, genetic, or both to some degree? How should society be in this regard?
2.Do you actually think jews are more inclined into tricking people? Do you believe people at the top (CEO's of big companies, banks and stuff) are mostly jewish? Is it gentic or cultural or both? How should society behave in this regard?
2 Bonus. What do you think of adolf hitler?
Actually I don't know if we can discuss this, 22 is hosted in germany where they are very strict about it. Maybe we shouldn't even have point two at all, mods feel free to edit this post and remove the second point if it's an issue
3. Lgbtqanlmnop, what are your thoughts? Would you really be upset with someone just because they're gay/transexual/whatever? Are transitions harmful?
R: 5 / I: 2
For example, approximately 97,000 jews were enslaved by Roman soldiers in the 70 AD siege of Jerusalem, after being taken as prisoners of war; was there anything wrong with this? (especially considering that the jewish diaspora consisted of jews voluntarily leaving Judea to gain influence abroad long before 70 AD, not of jewish slaves being sent elsewhere, as Zionists typically claim)
On one hand (mostly applicable to blacks), slavery brought non-whites to white lands en masse, which leads directly to the negroid problem in north and south America (and to a lesser extent, Europe) and thereby to the negrification of the world, as it was launched out of the USA. Of course, jews were heavily over-represented in the trans-Atlantic slave trade, many West Africans even being owned by North African jews before being sold to other jews coming from Spain, Holland or elsewhere. It also technically brought Asiatic and Caucasus peoples to Eastern and Central Europe en masse, leading to Russia's problem with non-Slavic Mongoloids ravaging the entire country and being pushed as "Russians" by Putin and the jewish oligarchs.
However, slavery also represents an example of white domination over jews (in-case of the Roman sack of 70 AD) and of course, of negroids; at the time this happened, no-one saw it as morally wrong (in-fact, it was required in the past due to the lack of factories), thus discarding white enslavement of other races is essentially denying that whites ever dominated their main racial enemies in the past.
So what is your opinion on this enigma? The main conflict in my view is either slavery of non-whites as an example of historical white dominance, or jews being responsible for slavery and thus dispersing negroids and mongoloids throughout the western world; so at least "white apology" over slavery can be completely rejected, as it's wholly anti-white in nature, and is logically invalid anyways as it projects modern views of slavery onto pre-industrial societies.
Slavery (of non-whites)
There is a large enigma over historical non-white slavery that is often overlooked among pro-white circles. Of course, the slavery of whites by non-whites (typically jews and whomever they sold them to, which occurred on all continents including sub-Saharan Africa) was bad, but what of the slavery of non-whites in the west, including but not limited to negroids?For example, approximately 97,000 jews were enslaved by Roman soldiers in the 70 AD siege of Jerusalem, after being taken as prisoners of war; was there anything wrong with this? (especially considering that the jewish diaspora consisted of jews voluntarily leaving Judea to gain influence abroad long before 70 AD, not of jewish slaves being sent elsewhere, as Zionists typically claim)
On one hand (mostly applicable to blacks), slavery brought non-whites to white lands en masse, which leads directly to the negroid problem in north and south America (and to a lesser extent, Europe) and thereby to the negrification of the world, as it was launched out of the USA. Of course, jews were heavily over-represented in the trans-Atlantic slave trade, many West Africans even being owned by North African jews before being sold to other jews coming from Spain, Holland or elsewhere. It also technically brought Asiatic and Caucasus peoples to Eastern and Central Europe en masse, leading to Russia's problem with non-Slavic Mongoloids ravaging the entire country and being pushed as "Russians" by Putin and the jewish oligarchs.
However, slavery also represents an example of white domination over jews (in-case of the Roman sack of 70 AD) and of course, of negroids; at the time this happened, no-one saw it as morally wrong (in-fact, it was required in the past due to the lack of factories), thus discarding white enslavement of other races is essentially denying that whites ever dominated their main racial enemies in the past.
So what is your opinion on this enigma? The main conflict in my view is either slavery of non-whites as an example of historical white dominance, or jews being responsible for slavery and thus dispersing negroids and mongoloids throughout the western world; so at least "white apology" over slavery can be completely rejected, as it's wholly anti-white in nature, and is logically invalid anyways as it projects modern views of slavery onto pre-industrial societies.
R: 2 / I: 0
>The Linux Foundation and its communities stand in solidarity voicing support for the Black community. The system under which we operate requires change to make justice and equality a reality. We support the individuals and organizations offering solutions for such changes, and we will be planning how we can support change as well.
>We are proud (and privileged) to work with communities and members that support our initiatives and reflect the same values. We have collected statements from across our communities that voice this collective support.
https://www.linuxfoundation.org/blog/2020/06/linux-foundation-support-for-the-black-community/
I hope Linus Torvalds is happy.
Linux cucks to niggers
Linux Foundation Support for the Black Community>The Linux Foundation and its communities stand in solidarity voicing support for the Black community. The system under which we operate requires change to make justice and equality a reality. We support the individuals and organizations offering solutions for such changes, and we will be planning how we can support change as well.
>We are proud (and privileged) to work with communities and members that support our initiatives and reflect the same values. We have collected statements from across our communities that voice this collective support.
https://www.linuxfoundation.org/blog/2020/06/linux-foundation-support-for-the-black-community/
I hope Linus Torvalds is happy.
R: 12 / I: 1
Hollywood is more than capable of these types of projects, so why wouldn't a blackops government project be?
Is "Naomi Seibt" wearing a mask?
Seriously, this Seibt character looks so freakish and artificial that I actually wonder if this is just some actress (or even actor) wearing a latex mask, purposely made to look ghoulish and creepy.Hollywood is more than capable of these types of projects, so why wouldn't a blackops government project be?
R: 13 / I: 2
This "Ahmaud Arbery" case seems to be another race-war op, following other recent "white nationalist" terror hoaxes. First of all, it took place on the 23rd of February, despite the fact that nobody heard about this event until now. I've heard about a (fake) terror threat involving "neo-Nazis" spreading the coronavirus and bombing a hospital before I ever heard of this. Typically events like this are reported as soon as they happen. I assume as virus fearmongering was still at its peak, they didn't have time to easily fit in a hoax attack, so they made one up as it's coming to a close. 23/2 is another shady date: in the traditional 365 month year, there are 311 days left. Of course, it's another example of numbers that multiply together into 33, like the Winnenden school shooting (which was already foreshadowed on Krautchan hours before it happened, admittedly not by the supposed perpetrator itself) taking place on the 11th of March, also rendered 3/11 in the USA. See also other fake events taking place on the 23rd day, namely July, also see the so-called "923 prophecy" from 2017. The shooters, Travis and Greg have the last name "McMichael". Not a fraudulent surname, but do take the initials of it into account: MM, another marker for fake events/people.
This "Ahmaud Arbery" case seems to be another race-war op, following other recent "white nationalist" terror hoaxes. First of all, it took place on the 23rd of February, despite the fact that nobody heard about this event until now. I've heard about a (fake) terror threat involving "neo-Nazis" spreading the coronavirus and bombing a hospital before I ever heard of this. Typically events like this are reported as soon as they happen. I assume as virus fearmongering was still at its peak, they didn't have time to easily fit in a hoax attack, so they made one up as it's coming to a close. 23/2 is another shady date: in the traditional 365 month year, there are 311 days left. Of course, it's another example of numbers that multiply together into 33, like the Winnenden school shooting (which was already foreshadowed on Krautchan hours before it happened, admittedly not by the supposed perpetrator itself) taking place on the 11th of March, also rendered 3/11 in the USA. See also other fake events taking place on the 23rd day, namely July, also see the so-called "923 prophecy" from 2017. The shooters, Travis and Greg have the last name "McMichael". Not a fraudulent surname, but do take the initials of it into account: MM, another marker for fake events/people.
R: 14 / I: 2
Hitler should have won.
Hitler should have won.
R: 1 / I: 1
Hey /pol/, I have decided to come here to brief my political opinions.
I'm an Arab traditionalist, who believes that the current state of affairs in Arabia is caused by inorganic entities that wish to take over our clay. I believe that the state is inorganic in that it creates a divide between the leader and his people inherently if not when the state is established, then over time, and therefore a communal traditionalist government is the way to go. Now, you may ask "How could this apply to a giant entity like Arabia?", and my answer here is a confederation. Communities should be independent. I'm not an anarcho-capitalist per se, but I do believe in covenant communities.
Of course, to me, I don't want too many expatriates in my lands. These Western rootless cosmopolitans wish to turn Arabia into another Vegas, they want to turn our people into a bunch of materialistic and hedonistic pieces of filth. Western ideas are incompatible with our ideas, and so for an Arab to adopt Western ideas to me is traitorous.
Hey /pol/, I have decided to come here to brief my political opinions.
I'm an Arab traditionalist, who believes that the current state of affairs in Arabia is caused by inorganic entities that wish to take over our clay. I believe that the state is inorganic in that it creates a divide between the leader and his people inherently if not when the state is established, then over time, and therefore a communal traditionalist government is the way to go. Now, you may ask "How could this apply to a giant entity like Arabia?", and my answer here is a confederation. Communities should be independent. I'm not an anarcho-capitalist per se, but I do believe in covenant communities.
Of course, to me, I don't want too many expatriates in my lands. These Western rootless cosmopolitans wish to turn Arabia into another Vegas, they want to turn our people into a bunch of materialistic and hedonistic pieces of filth. Western ideas are incompatible with our ideas, and so for an Arab to adopt Western ideas to me is traitorous.
R: 3 / I: 0
Based Bolsonaro
Hey foreigners, here in Brazil, Bolsonaro liberated a NEETCare, like a public-fund/voucher to Informal Workers but thanks to the not hard fiscalization literally us NEET will received this money, is like a salary to be NEET. Based and Redpilled.
R: 2 / I: 0
https://news.yahoo.com/hungary-effectively-suspends-parliament-elections-145000624.html
Hitler is reborn.
https://news.yahoo.com/hungary-effectively-suspends-parliament-elections-145000624.html
Hitler is reborn.
R: 6 / I: 0
Hello.
On behalf of the Creators of Heaven (all three of them) I would like to apologise for its racist ways. Things are changing. They could not deliver this message themselves because they are effectively dead and divided by the tongue of [the] spirit.
- signed by The Holder of Heaven
Hello.
On behalf of the Creators of Heaven (all three of them) I would like to apologise for its racist ways. Things are changing. They could not deliver this message themselves because they are effectively dead and divided by the tongue of [the] spirit.
- signed by The Holder of Heaven
R: 5 / I: 0
the free USA is on its deathbed
enjoy it while you still can
the free USA is on its deathbed
enjoy it while you still can
R: 35 / I: 3
8cahn down or baned?
I can't acces 8chan, did they baned it in germany or is it down? the strangest part is that when I wanted to make a thread about it in 4chan it was marked as spam even though no one is posting about 8chan.
R: 1 / I: 0
Do you think James Mason had some good ideas? I dig his whole personality. Is there any must see content he's produced?
Do you think James Mason had some good ideas? I dig his whole personality. Is there any must see content he's produced?
R: 13 / I: 0
What are 22chan's thoughts on NP (the nigger problem)?
What are 22chan's thoughts on NP (the nigger problem)?
R: 12 / I: 3
Don't judge me, but Hitler looks like a nice dude for me.
Don't judge me, but Hitler looks like a nice dude for me.
R: 90 / I: 6
No "An"-Caps allowed
/ag/: Anarchy General
Anarchism on /pol/: General. Talk, do shit, ask us about anarchism, talk about anarchism.No "An"-Caps allowed
R: 6 / I: 1
2019 Stock Market Crash Official Thread
Are you guys ready for the financial crash?
R: 5 / I: 4
Post your political views summed up in one picture
Post your political views summed up in one picture
R: 4 / I: 0
We're losing the battle.
We're losing the battle.
R: 3 / I: 1
[spoiler]here's an example of a quality /pol/ thread, webmfag[/spoiler]
When are the normals gonna learn that you shouldn't post anything on the internet unless they'd be ok with EVERYONE seeing it? This used to be common knowledge. [spoiler]Subject isn't too overdone, but people should still be somewhat familiar with the issue[/spoiler]
I believe that all information posted onto the internet should be considered public domain. This includes tiddies. Especially tiddies.[spoiler]Actionable talking point. People have something to discuss instead of just "yeah i hate roasties too fuckin whores reeeeeee" since this slightly departs from the porn aspect. Do you really think everything should be public domain, or should there still be limits in place?[/spoiler]
https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1326&context=djglp
>A recent study suggests that one in eight social media users has been a victim of nonconsensual porn, and that women are 1.7 times more likely to be targeted than men. According to a 2016 report, one in twenty-five U.S. residents have either been victims of nonconsensual porn or have been threatened with posting sensitive images without their consent. That number rises to one in eight for women between the ages of 15 and 29.[spoiler]sauce/example[/spoiler]
What this fails to show is that women also post more nude images online and get more pissed when things don't go their way. If they just stopped this wouldn't be nearly so much of a problem.
Basically I wish people could still be cunts on the internet without getting the fucking police on their dicks. If you don't want to get cyberbullied stay on fucking wikipedia and cnn.com and shit. Or better yet, don't use the internet at all.
[spoiler]here's an example of a quality /pol/ thread, webmfag[/spoiler]
When are the normals gonna learn that you shouldn't post anything on the internet unless they'd be ok with EVERYONE seeing it? This used to be common knowledge. [spoiler]Subject isn't too overdone, but people should still be somewhat familiar with the issue[/spoiler]
I believe that all information posted onto the internet should be considered public domain. This includes tiddies. Especially tiddies.[spoiler]Actionable talking point. People have something to discuss instead of just "yeah i hate roasties too fuckin whores reeeeeee" since this slightly departs from the porn aspect. Do you really think everything should be public domain, or should there still be limits in place?[/spoiler]
https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1326&context=djglp
>A recent study suggests that one in eight social media users has been a victim of nonconsensual porn, and that women are 1.7 times more likely to be targeted than men. According to a 2016 report, one in twenty-five U.S. residents have either been victims of nonconsensual porn or have been threatened with posting sensitive images without their consent. That number rises to one in eight for women between the ages of 15 and 29.[spoiler]sauce/example[/spoiler]
What this fails to show is that women also post more nude images online and get more pissed when things don't go their way. If they just stopped this wouldn't be nearly so much of a problem.
Basically I wish people could still be cunts on the internet without getting the fucking police on their dicks. If you don't want to get cyberbullied stay on fucking wikipedia and cnn.com and shit. Or better yet, don't use the internet at all.
R: 19 / I: 8
Glory to Israel
Niggers are people too
It's ok to be gay
Violence is inherently wrong
Glory to Israel
Niggers are people too
It's ok to be gay
Violence is inherently wrong
R: 2 / I: 0
political or otherwise.
Argue amongst yourselves.
Pour your feelings out and relax.
No one will hate you because you think diffrently. Free speach is supported here friends.
/pol/osophy
Discuss your philosophy,political or otherwise.
Argue amongst yourselves.
Pour your feelings out and relax.
No one will hate you because you think diffrently. Free speach is supported here friends.
R: 4 / I: 1
>He will put niggers on their right place
>He used to be a soldier
>He is not in that very corrupt partie that Lula de Silva used to be
Brazil took the right choice.
Jair Bolsonaro
Haven't seen anybody who made a threath about the victory of this gentleman although it was a very loud news in /pol/ and alt-right, so I'll start:>He will put niggers on their right place
>He used to be a soldier
>He is not in that very corrupt partie that Lula de Silva used to be
Brazil took the right choice.
R: 28 / I: 8
ok
>aussie "Brenton Tarrant"
>announces what shit he's going to do on 8chan
>phone on the head livestreaming on facebook
>eurobeat playing in the car
>"Subscribe to Pewdiepie".mp3
>fucking shooting range in the car
>drives in front of mosque
>opens fire at muslims
>kills.mp4
>drives and shoots through the window at people
50 people are dead. I am not muslim, but this act is fucking autistic.
He was shooting innocent civilians. Seriously, enough of this crap.
(You can find that video uploaded on 4chin or plebbit, but it's getting deleted fast.)
https://www.news.com.au/world/pacific/gunman-who-opened-fire-on-christchurch-mosque-addresses-attack-in-manifesto/news-story/70372a39f720697813607a9ec426a734
https://www.newsweek.com/two-mosques-attacked-new-zealand-multiple-injuries-reported-city-goes-1364022
Christchurch attack thread
>nobody is posting about itok
>aussie "Brenton Tarrant"
>announces what shit he's going to do on 8chan
>phone on the head livestreaming on facebook
>eurobeat playing in the car
>"Subscribe to Pewdiepie".mp3
>fucking shooting range in the car
>drives in front of mosque
>opens fire at muslims
>kills.mp4
>drives and shoots through the window at people
50 people are dead. I am not muslim, but this act is fucking autistic.
He was shooting innocent civilians. Seriously, enough of this crap.
(You can find that video uploaded on 4chin or plebbit, but it's getting deleted fast.)
https://www.news.com.au/world/pacific/gunman-who-opened-fire-on-christchurch-mosque-addresses-attack-in-manifesto/news-story/70372a39f720697813607a9ec426a734
https://www.newsweek.com/two-mosques-attacked-new-zealand-multiple-injuries-reported-city-goes-1364022
R: 1 / I: 0
>taking shitty business writing course at uni
>get to unit about eliminating bias from writing
>look at list of examples what *not* to write
>the only thing that runs through my head is "based"
What is wrong with me.
>taking shitty business writing course at uni
>get to unit about eliminating bias from writing
>look at list of examples what *not* to write
>the only thing that runs through my head is "based"
What is wrong with me.
R: 6 / I: 1
Tarrant
Time is now
R: 52 / I: 6
Ask Kek anything
Ask Kek anything
R: 3 / I: 1
>get in argument with white-apologist cuck
>starts sperging out becuz "muh slavery"
>says I should "pay for what my fathers did"
>crack open family records
>trace the life stories of all my ancestors as far back as I can, in some cases as far back as the 15th century
>not a single one owned slaves
Friendly reminder that slaves were owned only by the richest of the rich, who then tried to pass the blame onto the poor and uneducated. Also slavery started with the Jews, but you don't see them catching blame.
>get in argument with white-apologist cuck
>starts sperging out becuz "muh slavery"
>says I should "pay for what my fathers did"
>crack open family records
>trace the life stories of all my ancestors as far back as I can, in some cases as far back as the 15th century
>not a single one owned slaves
Friendly reminder that slaves were owned only by the richest of the rich, who then tried to pass the blame onto the poor and uneducated. Also slavery started with the Jews, but you don't see them catching blame.
R: 27 / I: 3
For me, I am from a muslim country so I don't get to experience western PC culture other than seeing it
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pgqGDsL_Drw
PC Culture
ITT: Tell us how much PC culture has worsened your countryFor me, I am from a muslim country so I don't get to experience western PC culture other than seeing it
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pgqGDsL_Drw
R: 3 / I: 1
>People waving American flags and using fucking Pepe as a symbol of the revolution
That damn frog sure gets around.
>People asking for 2nd Amendment, wanting to be treated like humans, all that
>Last I heard the Chinese government was mobilizing to take care of protestors
Do you think the protestors will get what they want? Is civil war a possibility? Independence for Hong Kong? Or will this just be yet another "thing that never happened"? I'm excited to see how this turns out.
Hong Kong Protests
>massive protests currently going on in Hong Kong>People waving American flags and using fucking Pepe as a symbol of the revolution
That damn frog sure gets around.
>People asking for 2nd Amendment, wanting to be treated like humans, all that
>Last I heard the Chinese government was mobilizing to take care of protestors
Do you think the protestors will get what they want? Is civil war a possibility? Independence for Hong Kong? Or will this just be yet another "thing that never happened"? I'm excited to see how this turns out.
R: 1 / I: 0
In the system of the national monarchy, finance serves the economy and the economy for the nation. From this it follows that the Ruler emits national money - his own currency, respectively to the increase or decrease of the number of population and the needs of the national economy, i.e. the economic parity. This is due to the fact that the privilege of issuing national currency belongs to the basic determinants of an independent nation and state, and as such it can never be surrendered by the king to anyone.
In the system of the national monarchy, finance serves the economy and the economy for the nation. From this it follows that the Ruler emits national money - his own currency, respectively to the increase or decrease of the number of population and the needs of the national economy, i.e. the economic parity. This is due to the fact that the privilege of issuing national currency belongs to the basic determinants of an independent nation and state, and as such it can never be surrendered by the king to anyone.
R: 7 / I: 1
What happened to the new world?
People once known for braving the cold and pushing the frontier are now known for their liberal ways and their extreme pacifism.
What happened to the "True North Strong and Free"?
What happened to the new world?
People once known for braving the cold and pushing the frontier are now known for their liberal ways and their extreme pacifism.
What happened to the "True North Strong and Free"?
R: 3 / I: 0
Someone send me a link so i don't have to keep digging through jewgle for a decent "translation"
Pic untelated.
Someone send me a link so i don't have to keep digging through jewgle for a decent "translation"
Pic untelated.
R: 4 / I: 2
Is a there a single place in the world without those fucking kikes?
They are one of the sponsors, so i guess they run this place aswell.
(((They))) are everywhere
Just took this pic at my uni, sorry for the dogshit quality though.Is a there a single place in the world without those fucking kikes?
They are one of the sponsors, so i guess they run this place aswell.
R: 2 / I: 1
India will become a next big thing ,
People and westerner make our fun because they are afraude of us , and our glory , Britain was a shit hole before India and noe by 2027 we will have toilets for almost everyone
India will become a next big thing ,
People and westerner make our fun because they are afraude of us , and our glory , Britain was a shit hole before India and noe by 2027 we will have toilets for almost everyone
R: 8 / I: 1
>Extension blocks content that is (subjectively) considered "toxic"
>Ads on news media everywhere
https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/qvyakw/this-chrome-extension-lets-you-tune-out-toxic-comments-online
end is near guys, i knew it.
BAN (different) OPINIONS
>"oh boy what is this? Somebody has different opinion than me?">Extension blocks content that is (subjectively) considered "toxic"
>Ads on news media everywhere
https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/qvyakw/this-chrome-extension-lets-you-tune-out-toxic-comments-online
end is near guys, i knew it.
R: 0 / I: 0 (sticky)
Off-topic and /b/-tier threads will be deleted (and possibly earn you a ban, if you persist). Unless they are quality, well thought out, well written posts, the following are some examples of off-topic and/or /b/-tier threads:
>Red pill me on X. (with no extra content or input of your own)
>Are X white?
>Is X degeneracy?
>How come X girls love Y guys so much?
>If X is true, then how come Y? Checkmate Z.
The variety of threads allowed here are very flexible and we believe in freedom of speech, but we expect a high level of discourse befitting of the board. Attempts to disrupt the board will not be tolerated, nor will calls to disrupt other boards and sites.
Welcome to /pol/
This board is for the discussion of news, world events, political issues, and other related topics.Off-topic and /b/-tier threads will be deleted (and possibly earn you a ban, if you persist). Unless they are quality, well thought out, well written posts, the following are some examples of off-topic and/or /b/-tier threads:
>Red pill me on X. (with no extra content or input of your own)
>Are X white?
>Is X degeneracy?
>How come X girls love Y guys so much?
>If X is true, then how come Y? Checkmate Z.
The variety of threads allowed here are very flexible and we believe in freedom of speech, but we expect a high level of discourse befitting of the board. Attempts to disrupt the board will not be tolerated, nor will calls to disrupt other boards and sites.