Why are you guys so upset? Don't you worry about reverse-racism, cuz you are certified niggers.>https://nationalvanguard.org/2020/06/its-never-been-about-fairness/>Source: Author
Read some fucking wikipedia please.
Anyway, your article seems upset about there being new policies which favor non-white males, to some extent disfavoring white males as a result.
But guess what? This shit ain't new at all.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affirmative_action_in_the_United_States
Affirmative action used to refer to policies against discrimination, before shifting to policies supporting minorities in work/education.
Obviously if you favor minorities and women in a competitive environment you will disfavor white men. However, you should take in consideration the fact that perhaps because of cultural reasons white men might be favored beforehand, by growing up in a better environment or some shit. Maybe some dumbass parents would be more inclined to tell their girl not to go to a computer science university rather than their male kid. So affirmative action discrimination might act as a balancing force to cultural discrimination, with the end result ideally being equal opportunity regardless of your background.
But let's return to the idea that these policies are something new that niggers are pushing now that they are so many! These policies fucking aren't:>In a 1973 court case, a federal judge created one of the first mandated quotas when he ruled that half of the Bridgeport, Connecticut Police Department's new employees must be either black or Puerto Rican
Huh? What's that? 20 years before the Proposition 209, and it is extremely racist towards right people. What about california?>In 1978, the Supreme Court ruled in Regents of the University of California v. Bakke that public universities (and other government institutions) could not set specific numerical targets based on race for admissions or employment. The Court said that "goals" and "timetables" for diversity could be set instead
So affirmative action existed before the proposition, and actually the proposition stopped it!
It was actually opposed by some groups for this reason:>The initiative was opposed by affirmative action advocates and traditional civil rights and feminist organizations on the left side of the political spectrum.
In other words, it was never a concession to black people, rather a ban on affirmative action which helped black people. The article makes it look the opposite.
Also, affirmative action IS a way to fight racism, and not "reverse-racism". Reverse-racism is found in bait articles made for people like you by nigger trolls.
However, I will agree that it's not that clear whether affirmative action is something good/fair. From the article on the proposition:>Supporters of Proposition 209 contended that existing affirmative action programs led public employers and universities to reject applicants based on their race, and that Proposition 209 would "restore and reconfirm the historic intention of the 1964 Civil Rights Act." The basic and simple premise of Proposition 209 is that every individual has a right, and that right is not to be discriminated against, or granted a preference, based on their race or gender. Since the number of available positions are limited, discriminating against or giving unearned preference to a person based solely, or even partially on race or gender deprives qualified applicants of all races an equal opportunity to succeed. It also pits one group against another and perpetuates social tension.
Which sounds pretty fair. However don't forget that this doesn't consider the cultural background. Asian people have parents that value education, as such they are much better off in the competition for university positions. It's not the niggers' student fault his parents didn't put as much value in education as asian parents would've, is it? And yet he will be disadvantaged. I'm not saying that affirmative action is good, all I'm saying is that you should keep this inequality in mind. Kids don't choose where they are born, and they don't deserve a shittier future for it.
Here's the pov of the opposition:>Opponents of Proposition 209 argued that it would end affirmative action practices of tutoring, mentoring, outreach and recruitment of women and minorities in California universities and businesses and would gut state and local protections against discrimination. Immediately after passage of Proposition 209, students held demonstrations and walk-outs in protest at several universities including UC Berkeley, UCLA, UC Santa Cruz, and San Francisco State University.