no but makes me feel cringe and abomination
I recoil at the sight of this abomination. It makes me despair for those who feel entranced by this evil.
feel bad for him more then anything else tbh
being a tranny at this point would be less cringy
People like this simply haven't been brought up properly chuck him in the army and he won't last a day
Xhe is hot
xyzshen'txup isnt hot
redpilled and orangepilled.
Post made by discord gang
why because he is famous?
I would fuck anything
((* O ω O)
because he's gay and puts makeup for attention. or maybe because he sings so bad it hurts
why does everyone hate James Charles so much? all he does is makeup videos and shit and yet all I hear is people hating him, I haven't heard of him actually doing anything bad to anyone
who even the fuck is this gender autistic retard?
why is narcissism so prevalent among fags
because they are like girls
actually yes i do
hes a pedo that made 14 year olds "clap their cheeks" and send him pictures of their asshole so they can prove that they are his number 1 fan
i'd clap his cheeks if you know what i mean
Thats a pretty feminine looking ass though
I'll give you that much
damn, he just lost like 3 mil subscribers following some faggot drama.
That’s a cute bitch. I’d fuck his ass.
Why do you care so much?
Punch yourself in the face OP, you are a faggot inside after all.
I would but that would require me to touch it.
Homo/transsexuals make my skin crawl.
faggots used to be called flamers because you'd set them on fire.....
heck, if i remember correctly ((they)) tried to make ironman bisexual.
The image above is from Superior Iron Man #8 (note the fact that he was in an "inplied" orgy. Also note the men in the room. ) they also tried to kill off iron man and replace him with a 15 year old black girl who stole the suit.
Continuing, iceman, and beast are gay for no reason than "just because we can" even though they both dated, and been in sexual relationships with women. Not just "bisexual" no. Gay. How the hell does that just happen? Loki's also "genderfluid"
Of course these things applies to all of comicbooks. The next thor movie will fave a female thor, and its gonna be a gay romance movie.
Also, did you know they used to tell them when someone is going to get the "transgender" Surgery that no matter what they think, they are that gender? As in :
If you are a male, and you are getting the female surgery, you are male even after you get the surgery. Used to tell them that legally, but people got triggred.
>>622>loki being genderfluid
I take it you've never heard of Sleipnir?
AKA "slippy" or "the sliding one"
Marvel or regular?
as far as i remember he made an appearance as far back as 2001
i'm reffering to the marvel version of loki where he is pansexual AND genderfluid for political reasons.
The regular mythology version was that way because "ruthless trickster god"
Do you think the greeks where pandering to the furries when zeus transformed into a swan and raped ledia? No, he was doing this because he could'nt keep it in his pants, and was also a degenerate. That always was his undoing.
*and was usually the point of the story
autistic keyboard skills
Did anything wrong really ever happen to Zeus after his occasional degeneratic mishaps?
Hera happened. That guy was married to the biggest bitch in Olympus, you bet your ass that he caught more than an earful whenever he got caught whoring around.
Dammit you beat me to the punch.
But yeah, hera never forgave zeus, and the other gods got wind of what happend, he has kids by having sex with every women he sees and hera, in a jelous rage useually kills the children/secret wives. Also he has sex with a young boy, i forgot what happend in that story.
I beleve he turns into a woman and tricks some other got into having sex with him. Usually he ends up gaining a bad reputation, and starts wars.
...and people wonder why faggotory and sexual deviancy kept getting murdered from society to society, lots of societies in the past allowed faggotory and sexual degeneracy, only for them to fall and everyone to realize that it was a mistake...only for time to roll on long enough for people to forget why we hung and burned faggots in the first place....
I would but being gay is a superpower in today's society. You can get away with being disgusting simply because you are (((different))) and (((unique))). I may be able to carry out a punch but I may leave the room before I can do it out of recoil from this kind of faggotry.
Even though he does look a bit unusual, the impression I got from casually hearing about him was mostly positive
Since we aren't normalfags we are above judging by appearance, right?>>631
No society lasts forever, countries die and are born, and with them are ideals. I think considering sexual promiscuity and homosexuality as the primary cause of societies' decadence is slightly simplistic>>1836
Punching any person with no reason, gay or not, will have strong consequences in today society. So I don't understand why you'd bring up the "homosexuality is a superpower" argument
Regarding the "getting away with being disgusting", I think I disagree with your ideas about what "disgusting" is and how "disgusting" things should be treated.
I don't like how he looks, but I think that my view on looks shouldn't dictate how other people dress. Having a strict etiquette on how people should look would suck hard imo.
If by disgusting you mean homosexual, let me remind you that tchaikovsky, oscar wilde and many other notable artist were homosexuals, and looking at them it becomes hard to believe that they all were disgusting
Maybe we should set aside our personal feelings about gay sex and consider for a moment the possibility that certain stereotypes are built on cherrypicked examples.
It is disgusting how people like James Charles who is in the photo can become a multimillionaire for being gay. He has made it far in the industry because the media pushed him only because he was gay. What does this say about the media's motivation? People already have a strict etiquette on how people should look. People are more likely to want an attractive person as a friend or date for a reason. I don't care that Oscar Wilde was gay his book The Importance of Being Earnest was painful to read. I don't understand what you are trying to say. Being gay is also simply not normal. Gay people are less than 10% of the population. What does that say about how normal that is? You are probably a leftist or a lolbertarian so stop being underhanded.
The media is a piece of shit, and it is pushing stuff like that, I agree, but I don't think one can obtain and keep james charles' fame just by being gay.
If you're upset about the money he undeservedly gets, then you should also be upset about sportsmen. They make crazy money for doing practically useless stuff. Think about that amount of money going into education.>People already have a strict etiquette on how people should look. People are more likely to want an attractive person as a friend or date for a reason.
Yes and no. Popularity of certain hairstyles, clothes and make up vary wildly in different places and times.>Gay people are less than 10% of the population.
People with green eyes are less than 5% of the population as well. So what?
And why is it suddenly important to be "normal" on an imageboard?>I don't understand what you are trying to say
I had no idea what you meant by saying that being gay is disgusting, so I tried to prove it false by bringing up positive examples of gay people
Also please stop putting two spaces after each dot. It makes you recognizable across threads
James Charles is doing too well for too long to be famous just because he's gay, even if it might've helped him in the beginning
Hairstyles, clothes and make-up are very subjective (proof is how much they vary with time)
Why are gay people disgusting? Why is being "normal" important?
>>1842>I don't think one can obtain and keep james charles' fame just by being gay.
He is astroturfed and was youtubes golden gay boy that sure helped along with gay which is what the media is pushing.>Yes and no
Sure it differs from place to place, but it isn't exactly easy to move for most people. You are also rolling the dice to the extent that you be popular in the area you are moving to.>And why is it suddenly important to be "normal" on an imageboard?
Why are you bringing up imageboards? That is irrelvent to the social issue that we are talking about. Imageboards is made up of many different people with different people and opinions why should I have to tolerate everything because we aren't "normal.">Also please stop putting two spaces after each dot. It makes you recognizable across threads
Sure. Posting consistently here sure doesn't help too.>Why is being "normal" important?
Society needs to succeed in order for the population to have a comfy life. I won't go deep into this because you won't understand most likely.
>>1843>He is astroturfed and was youtubes golden gay boy that sure helped along with gay which is what the media is pushing.
I agree that it might have helped. But do you agree that it's not enough to keep him famous? He makes 1, 2 videos per week getting 5+millions view for every video. A lot of youtubes golden boys don't get anywhere near that>Sure it differs from place to place, but it isn't exactly easy to move for most people. You are also rolling the dice to the extent that you be popular in the area you are moving to.
My point is that there's nothing wrong in him putting make up the way he likes it, because different people see fashion differently. Of course if you dislike how he looks it's fine too.>Why are you bringing up imageboards? That is irrelvent to the social issue that we are talking about.
Imageboards, especially this place is against "normal"fags, so I'm surprised to hear from somebody here that normality is an important thing, and that not being normal is bad.>Society needs to succeed in order for the population to have a comfy life
So you believe that a society with gay people can't succeed? Why is it so? As we were saying before, some very very successful people are/were gay.
>>1844>He makes 1, 2 videos per week getting 5+millions view for every video. A lot of youtube golden boys don't get anywhere near that
He is involved in a lot of Youtube drama which keeps him in the public eye. There is certainly a core audience that is loyal to him no matter what he does. There is no way though that you can discount the help from Youtube.>Imageboards, especially this place is against "normal"fags
But he is celebrated by normalfaggots how is he any different from people who shun us? Being tolerant today is what is expected in today's society this protects people like James. If you have any deep seated beliefs that goes against society you are shunned.>So you believe that a society with gay people can't succeed?
Successful gay people that I know are mostly in creative fields which is different from most fields. This is antedotal but I have personally known two gay people. Both of them had traumatic experiences and thus have emotional baggage. This will make it harder for those two to function in comparison to someone who did not go through what they did. This may be a trend among gay people.
>>1854>He is involved in a lot of Youtube drama
I only ever heard of his drama once, and that one time he lost a shitton of subs>But he is celebrated by normalfaggots how is he any different from people who shun us? Being tolerant today is what is expected in today's society this protects people like James. If you have any deep seated beliefs that goes against society you are shunned.
I don't give a shit about what normalfags think. I'm arguing with you. You said in >>1840>Being gay is also simply not normal
What did you imply by that?
This is how I understood it:> Being gay is also simply not normal -> being gay is bad
Which implies:> Being anything not normal is bad
Being on imageboards is not normal. So by your logic we are all bad.
My point is that "not being normal is bad" should never, ever be an argument, especially in places like these.
But I probably misunderstood you. Maybe you meant "being gay is not natural"? Or you didn't intend to raise a point at all?
>This may be a trend among gay people.
Unless the emotional baggage is caused by being gay, it seems unfair to say that being gay is bad because of this
>>1856>Maybe you meant "being gay is not natural"?
Even if that's what he's trying to say, it's still a shit argument. Appeal to nature is a fallacy.