/pol/ - One day...


/pol/ - Politically Incorrect

[Return] [Go to Bottom] [Catalog]

File: 2019062065257--usa_states_….png (119.42 KB, 1200x632, 150:79, 1586754289671.png) [Show in Hex Viewer] [Reverse Image search]

 No.902[D]

One day...

 No.903[D][DF]

>>902
can you niggers help improve our /pol/ for once by not making obscure one comment threads?
please elaborate?

 No.1334[D][DF]

>>903
He's predicting the United States will change their flag to look like it belongs to some faction from a corny comic book.

 No.1335[D][DF]

>>1334
Why did you bump a two month-old thread, replying to a two-month old question while there are plenty of new in-depth threads? You literally can't even hide that you're just forum-sliding.

 No.1336[D][DF]

>>1335
>Why did you bump a two month-old thread, replying to a two-month old question
this is 22chan nigga, we should be encouraging people to reply to older threads instead of doing the damn opposite.

 No.1337[D][DF]

>>1334
although is is off-topic, do you know what comic lol
>>1336
this

 No.1338[D][DF]

>>1335
fuck off nigger and lurk more newfag. it's not your imageboard, although this thread's gay, it can improve

 No.1340[D][DF]

>>1336
>>1337
>>1338
>nigga
Using negroid slang to present yourself?
>"encouraging people to reply to older threads"
You're clearly ignoring the point, and you may be doing so intentionally. For some reason, threads such as >>1319 and >>1301, long, informative threads are completely being ignored with only two people in the entire board posting in them, yet some poster supposedly went out of their way to correct a poster from a low-quality, 2-month old thread, while sliding them by ignoring them completely? I don't want to jump to conclusions as usual, but you're raising a couple red flags here.
>fuck off nigger and lurk more newfag. it's not your imageboard, although this thread's gay, it can improve
Not even a good attempt to fit in. It's a bad thread that doesn't even elaborate on what it's talking about (it's a about a potential fascist USA as the flag combines a Prussian eagle with the stars and stripes, which is typical alt-history nonsense), and for some reason you're defending it.
I don't want to jump to conclusions here, but I have a suspicion that 146b8b5 is trying to disrupt the board by sliding high-quality threads and instead bumping old, one-sentence threads, especially considering that this ID is new.

 No.1342[D][DF]

>>1340
>>nigga
>Using negroid slang to present yourself?
Sure. "Nigger." Does that sound better now?
What you're getting angery about is that people are not replying to exactly the thing which you want to. You can't force people to like the same things/threads as you do.
>long, informative threads are completely being ignored
Have you seen those threads yourself? They are elaborate and informative, sure, but those are elaborate and informative schizo ramblings, not everyone is into that. Like >>1301 which poses an answer for a question that was never asked. Nationalsocialismus -> NatiSozi -> Nazi , That wasn't so hard, now was it? Instead it's got some completely unrelated points regarding linguistics, and you guys keep forgetting that correlation does not mean causation. "Nazi" in the fucken Zulu language, according to jewgle translate, means "Here you are", are the african spearchuckers also in this conspiracy?????
tl;dr everyone's got their own taste and while people are encouraged to diversify their interests and actively participate in threads it is not compulsory or forced, let people reply to what they want.

 No.1343[D][DF]

>>1340
>Using negroid slang to present yourself?
Nigga
>long, informative threads are completely being ignored
What if people don't like or care for those threads?
>I don't want to jump to conclusions here, but i'll do so anyway
Twoot's id system is stupid, it forgets ips, fails regularly.

 No.1344[D][DF]

>>1343
Or you might have a dynamic IP.

 No.1345[D][DF]

>>1344
>correlation does not mean causation
This, nicely said.
>Dynamic ip
Never thought of that, i'll have to test it out

 No.1347[D][DF]

>>1342
>What you're getting angery about is that people are not replying to exactly the thing which you want to. You can't force people to like the same things/threads as you do.
it's not about taste. Maybe if this board was a food board, and somebody was bumping a 2-month old thread on oysters, I wouldn't get mad. When random new IPs that have never been used before are making new one-sentence threads and bumping old ones around the same time higher-quality threads are made; that's a problem. That comes off as an attempt to disturb high-quality discussions, and seeing that this is already common enough on other literal shill outlets like 4chan (which has not only harboured feds for a long time, but was recently found out to have had a "Swiss" vatnik moderate its /pol/ board, banning anything exposing Putin and helping create anti-white memes), 8chan/"8kun" (run by an "ex"-military contractor/freemason and founded by a man working for a jewish employee before that), as well as a known tactic of countless other spooks/feds on older forums, read this:
https://archive.vn/9NS27
> If a very sensitive posting of a critical nature has been posted on a forum - it can be quickly removed from public view by 'forum sliding.' In this technique a number of unrelated posts are quietly prepositioned on the forum and allowed to 'age.' Each of these misdirectional forum postings can then be called upon at will to trigger a 'forum slide.' The second requirement is that several fake accounts exist, which can be called upon, to ensure that this technique is not exposed to the public. To trigger a 'forum slide' and 'flush' the critical post out of public view it is simply a matter of logging into each account both real and fake and then 'replying' to prepositined postings with a simple 1 or 2 line comment. This brings the unrelated postings to the top of the forum list, and the critical posting 'slides' down the front page, and quickly out of public view. Although it is difficult or impossible to censor the posting it is now lost in a sea of unrelated and unuseful postings. By this means it becomes effective to keep the readers of the forum reading unrelated and non-issue items.
Now isn't that a shocker? Since the same thing can be experienced and is actively encouraged in countless other boards, no matter how small they are (the "ACF" boards, jewlay world, etc.), such actions should immediately be viewed with suspicion.
>Have you seen those threads yourself?
Oh yes, I even made one of them.
>schizo ramblings
I don't even have to comment about how much "schizo" is used by jews with an unhealthy obsession. Yes, correlation isn't causation, so why is "something that goes too far out of the official narrative" schizophrenia? It utilises the same failed logic. It's more likely that the unhealthy obsession with "schizos" that shills have that's an actual pointer to schizophrenia, not the other way around.
>for a question that was never asked
I know you didn't read it, since it literally introduces itself with a context that it was following up on earlier findings of red flags in the NSDAP, namely Hebrew symbolism in the Waffen-SS. I'm not going to discuss it since that'll just derail the discussion even further.
>tl;dr everyone's got their own taste and while people are encouraged to diversify their interests and actively participate in threads it is not compulsory or forced, let people reply to what they want.
1. That's an excuse used on several other boards to justify actual forced spam and shilling. The thing with 22chan is that it encourages high-quality threads (at least on-paper...), it doesn't just appeal to free speech. Rule 1, 4 (outside of /b/), 7, 11, and 19-21 all make sure of that, specifically limiting the circle of discussion to favour quality.
2. What I was saying again, isn't that it's just someone else liking other stuff, it's that it comes off as intentionally disruptive, which is extremely suspicious. Why otherwise would all these random low-quality threads and bumping of old threads come around the same time new, bigger threads are made?

 No.1351[D][DF]

>>1347
*jewish employer

 No.1352[D][DF]

>>1347
22chan is slow, so threads aren't pushed into 404ing, meaning that threads gaining traction doesn't really affect any others. Nothing "slides out of the public view," it's all still there.
>Hebrew symbolism in the Waffen-SS
Alright, it's a good idea, but the nazi/nasi heeb linguistic shit is just mad.
>why is "something that goes too far out of the official narrative" schizophrenia?
There is a fine line when other interpretations of history stop being sensible and analytical, and become simply mad/crazy. Just because an interpretation is different doesn't mean that it's automatically good.
>intentionally disruptive
Sure, the one-liner threads are shit, but as i said with 22's speed it is nowhere near an actual problem.

 No.1353[D][DF]

>>1352
>Alright, it's a good idea, but the nazi/nasi heeb linguistic shit is just mad.
What's wrong with that though? Nazi actually comes from the Italian form of "Nationalsozialismus", from only the word "Nazionale" as "Sozi" is from "Sozialismus", or "Commie" from "Kommunismus". That's a good point of discussion for that thread itself, though nothing's being discussed there, it's just empty, rotting there while plenty of low-quality unrelated threads take up its place and thus shit up the front page. Sure, 22 is slow but sliding still has it's effects as the front page is littered with bad threads first, and then more quality threads. If this continues the way it does now, good threads are going to be buried by one-liner nonsense, and resurrecting older one-liner threads doesn't make things any better.

 No.1354[D][DF]

>>1340
Go away, disinfo shill. We've had enough of this rabble-rousing freakout trip you're going on.

 No.1355[D][DF]

>>1354
>253d136
The poster who can't prove the atomic theory (and thus, nukes) has resorted to typical shill tactics. Who would've thought? Ironic you're accusing me of "disinfo" while gatekeeping the nuclear hoax, or in the words keeping up the "don't stand up to the JWO or we'll bomb you" scare-tactic.

 No.1356[D][DF]

>>1355
You've been told already to fuck off, quit rabble-rousing

 No.1366[D][DF]

File: 1451465135866.png (108.07 KB, 398x360, 199:180, 1593312930925.png) [Show in Hex Viewer] [Reverse Image search]

>>1335
>>1340
>>1347
>>1351
>>1353
>>1355
>I'm going to get caught up in an argument because I think this thread shouldn't be bumped and bump this thread six more times in the process

 No.1370[D][DF]

>>1366
As if this board doesn't have an obvious sage feature?



[Reply to this Thread]

[Return] [Go to top] [Catalog]
[Post a Reply]