No.139[D][DF]
css settings aren't applied on the homepage
No.141[D][DF]
>>138I know guro/pron isn't allowed, but is poo poo pee pee allowed? It's not meant for porn, and it's pretty funny/amusing in my opinion.
Also, what constitutes as "racism" as mentioned in the rules? Is it talk about how blacks are, on average, less intelligent than whites on relevant boards like /pol/, or 4chon(?; in the past anyway; wouldn't know for sure, but presumably)/zog-nazi-tier "kill all non-whites" faggotry?
No.168[D][DF]
>>165>not respecting other people's opinionsalso woah new verification system thanks Twoot
No.169[D][DF]
>>168>>not respecting other people's opinionsWell, what does he mean exactly by that?
Like posting people who are shitting or pissing?
Those are still nude people=porn=not allowed.
>>141>racismcuck german laws, no hate speech, no denying the holohoax etc.
No.170[D][DF]
>>138allow me to call out normalnigger for invading my board, /r9k/
No.171[D][DF]
>>170also on this topic why are some of the rules shit?
>No threads containing or discussing about porn, gore or rekt. People killing people/etc. also counts as gore/rekt.why not? it specifically states in the rules no normalfags are allowed so what's the problem with posting gore? the only people that i assume that wouldn't like the gore or want any gore are normalfags/r*dditfags. also if this is suppose to be the better cuckchan why isn't there any nsfw boards?
No.173[D][DF]
>>171You are missing the point of 22chan.
Also,
One or two rekt threads arent going to keep normalfags from coming, they will quickly be outnumbered by cuck bbc threads. Just look at 4chans /b/. If you want that then just fuck off back to 4chinz.
No.187[D][DF]
Would you consider using this CSS? You can make it better of course.
https://freestyler.ws/style/136242/make-8chan-look-like-4chan No.188[D][DF]
Autosage the bot, he's necrobumping
No.190[D][DF]
>>188Agree. Also, it kinda bothers me that Steve says the exact same things as he does in the Discord.
No.191[D][DF]
>>190Now he will alternatingly post on 22chan and on the discord. So he posts on 22chan, then 4 hours later on the discord, then 4 hours later on 22chan again and so on.
No.194[D][DF]
>>193We dont have enough speed for another board
No.216[D][DF]
This whole site too slow
No.217[D][DF]
>>215Fixed, thanks for letting me know
No.218[D][DF]
Why tf are boardads only on the board? You're even linking to a live php script
No.219[D][DF]
>>216Well then make content you lazy fuck
No.220[D][DF]
Tags for /f/ when?
No.222[D][DF]
Frames when?
No.229[D][DF]
Some posts havent been showing up in the discord
No.230[D][DF]
>>229Probably because of the limit of tge discord api.
No.231[D][DF]
any chance of keeping pepe and wojak posts isolated to /b/?
No.234[D][DF]
>>232>>233Well why the hell not? We all know underage faggots use em anyways. Hell even the places that make them to make them "hatespeech symbols" hate em now.
No.235[D][DF]
>>234it would turn /b/ into just a general trashcan where all of that shit would be concentrated, it's not so visible when it's spread out
No.290[D][DF]
>>138 not really a suggestion but /f/ is going to be obselite and un necessary in 2020.
No.291[D][DF]
>>290The point of this /f/ is to harbor all re/f/ugees when Hiro deletes 4chans /f/.
Also its not like adobe is going to somehow corrupt every single flash in existance.
Jewgle chrome is one of the only gay browsers that is cutting support to flash. Good ones like waterfox will work just fine.
>ObsoleteOk, go make an animation in html5 then, come on, i dare you.
+Every non-fossilised browser already can block scripts, so there arent really any threats to security either.
>Unnecessary/f/ will always be necessary. How else will people share touhou flashes?
No.307[D][DF]
>>138>no ylyl postsDoes that mean humor threads are allowed?
And how do they differ from ylyl threads then?
That is, what exactly does make a ylyl thread a ylyl thread?
You catch my drift?
No.321[D][DF]
Someone's posting niggerlinks in the livechat. Probably cheese pizza.
No.323[D][DF]
>>290>>291Don't forget about just being able to still use a Flash Player on the PC and not needing a browser if somehow support is cut. So flash files will still be floating around the place online for years to come.
No.329[D][DF]
>>328Lole, there is always donate button :D, or do you mean a different appreciation? And how would that work?
https://22chan.org/faq#howdonate No.349[D][DF]
>>138can there be board for people who arrive from 4 chins so they don't make threads in other boards asking about or saying they're moving here
No.359[D][DF]
How about community moderation?( for refrence
https://chen2.org/) also, a question i have is, why aren't we aloud to use vpn? Or for the matter, is our ip address encrypted?
No.360[D][DF]
>>359Vpns not allowed, because it can be used for ban evasion. Also your ips are encrypted in the database of course.
No.361[D][DF]
>>360How would we know for sure if the source code is nonfree?
No.362[D][DF]
>>361You can’t, but im legally bound to not sharing any private data :) (read the legal section for more)
No.364[D][DF]
How about discouraging or banning normie memes and encourage memes as they were originally created, in-jokes within our community.
No.368[D][DF]
How about a zeronet port of 22chan?
https://zeronet.io/ No.369[D][DF]
>>368that'd probably mean losing all posts again and since twot doesn't sell IPs and user info to advertisers then i don't really see why would we need this
No.370[D][DF]
True.
No.371[D][DF]
>>364That's more up to to the users than the moderators.
No.388[D][DF]
>>231>>235why not ban pepe and wojak alltogether then?
Why have trash "spread out", just toss the garbage out.
>>387i think the good old normalfag is swell enough to address them
No.389[D][DF]
>>387ped is short for pedophile, which is not a normalfag concept.
No.390[D][DF]
>>389>peddont you mean "pedo"?
No.391[D][DF]
Heres an idea, lets call ourselves peds. : " I'm a ped, you godamn normie" sounds good lol.
No.392[D][DF]
>>391That's pretty much as retarded as saying
>im from the hacker clan anonymoose, you normieeim pulling a bit on the example sentence rather than the actual word, but even so it's retarded.
I don't want to switch out Anonymous/Anon for ped.
No.393[D][DF]
Come on, don't be an oldfag. This is a new era! We can call ourselves "the pedophiles" Sounds good, and has a nice ring to it.
No.395[D][DF]
Think of the conservative group the proud boys. Or P.B for short. We can call ourselves the Proud Pedophiles! Or P.P! "I'm a big P.P fan!" Sounds better than "anonymous" head over to 4chan and tell them, they'll agree thats its a GREAT IDEA
No.396[D][DF]
New April Fools 2020 idea for Twoot: change Anonymous to Pedophile.
No.397[D][DF]
>>393Using oldfag as an insult is a dangerous road to take, laddie. It's good to not be enamored by the transient wonders of an idealized and impossible to replicate past, but it is unwise to get carried away and dismiss all old things as useless. If you rot the roots to grow the branches, the tree will soon fall down.
No.403[D][DF]
>>401Activate windows first!
No.449[D][DF]
Start a thread to talk about 22chans history with the goal to update the timeline. (you know, about the whole carpgang thing, and so forth) if we talk about the past, we can save the future.
No.450[D][DF]
>>449I think the official timeline should be reserved for actual changes to site policy and whatnot. It shouldn't be an "every time a newfag tries and fails to force a meme" counter.
No.476[D][DF]
>>475well, there's only one or two comic threads on /b/ and i can only recall a few short-lived threads about /tv/ stuff, so actually i can say that there's almost no audience.
Splitting up the community by adding more boards at this point isn't a smart move.
No.477[D][DF]
I agree. Just make a thread.
No.478[D][DF]
>>476That's because people are too busy using /b/ for other shit.
I just want a place to discuss movies and western animation.
No.479[D][DF]
>>478Then make the thread about said movie/animation, see where it goes and how much attention it gets.
Start with something small nigga
No.480[D][DF]
It's possible to create a new board that instead of just splitting us up attracts an audience of its own. I've been thinking for a while that a /pdf/ board could do this, since the fall of 8chan (and its continued instability) destabilized a lot of its users who will now be searching for a new place to set up shop. The kind of people who use /pdf/ boards tend to be a tad more levelheaded than most other anons, if you get what I'm saying. They understand the benefits of comfyness. I think we could definitely benefit from their presence. At any rate, it could be kind of like /f/ where it's so exotic compared to other boards that there just isn't any room for competition.
No.481[D][DF]
>>138>Error: Invalid BoardCould someone please explain wtf this means and how to get around it? Any time I try to create a thread anywhere, this shit pops up and prevents me.
Seriously, how the fuck do I get around this?
No.482[D][DF]
>>481posting from the catalog page doesn't work on any board.
go out the catalog page just to the regular list of boards on a page and attempt to create a thread from there.
twoot's working on fixing this.
No.485[D][DF]
does 22chan have an archive?
No.487[D][DF]
>>486What s o r c e r y is this!
How did you even find this?
No.489[D][DF]
I need ur help, anons. I found one of the best things ever to happen on this site
https://22chan.org/archive/index.php?r=/sewers/res/383.htmlThis is in response to a habbening in a thread Twoot made about 22chan's first quarter. It was titled "end of Q1" or something to that effect. I cannot find this thread in the /b/ archive, the current /b/ catalog, or /sg/. If any of you know where I can find this, pls halp. This is history and it's going to be lost.
No.491[D][DF]
>>138Why does the /f/ reply counter cap at 5?
No.492[D][DF]
>>488Yes, its just a word filter
Its the same thing with /b/
No.493[D][DF]
>>481>>482It's been months Twoot, please fix it so people can make threads at the catalog pages.
No.494[D][DF]
>>138when hovering over a backlinnk, make the link to the post wher its backlinking from highlighted
No.495[D][DF]
>>138pls add banners and news to the cataloguses
No.496[D][DF]
>>138 (op)
make (op) after number of (op)
No.497[D][DF]
how do i crossboard post?
No.501[D][DF]
>>500it's so you don't miss it
lole jk
No.507[D][DF]
Perhaps this is just twööt telling me to stop sinning but whenever i moblefag i always get a error message that i misspelled my verification even though i didn't in the first place.
No.518[D][DF]
Sorry for being a bitch, but some faggot (perhaps a child) flooded livechan with normalnigger memes and gibberish.
No.519[D][DF]
I mean, more like nu-4cuck memes.
No.520[D][DF]
>>519how dare they desecrate our innermost sanctum.
No.549[D][DF]
The "Close" thing on the post form doesn't work for me
Also what about having autoplay music on /sewers/ or /b/ every once in a while? It could be fun. I dunno what do fellow anonymouse think?
No.550[D][DF]
>>549>The "Close" thing on the post form doesn't work for mesame
No.563[D][DF]
>>530wait, that's thanks for twoot? shit, I thought it was for corona
>>549>autoplay musichttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MlEsAzAjdi8for /sewers/
No.564[D][DF]
nah i think autoplay is a bad idea
probably make things laggy, and i just listen to the music i like anyway
>>563>its for cronalol i wish
No.565[D][DF]
>>564that's why autoplay is reserved for special occasions, such as april fools or halloween or days when Twoot is in a particularly whimsical mood
No.582[D][DF]
>>551the "close" button works now, but the "open" button doesn't
No.637[D][DF]
>>636this was something that was talked about before, and the answer is to
discourage frog posters. not downright BAN.
if we ban, it really looks bad. and then it would turn into a slippery slope of "lists of words we're not allowed to use" like some type of orwellian nightmare
not a fan of frogposters myself but the current system of things works well.
No.638[D][DF]
>>637I don't think I've seen any frogposters around lately anyway. I think most everybody here gets the message.
No.639[D][DF]
so this is more of a question than a suggestion:
So rule 20 states that you will not post or discuss porn/gore. My question is, does this apply to /i/? Like, am I allowed to show tits/dicks/guts in my art? Historically, art has always been considered separate from porn/gore.
No.640[D][DF]
>>639I think that hentai falls down the same category as regular porn, and as for ecchi it comes down to how much skin is shown since the puritanical anons of 22chan will start getting angery about it being absolutely haram.
I don't mind guro, but I don't really know if i'd want to see 22/i/ become a bootleg gurochan though either.
Surely there is some differentiation in like ancient nude sculptures made by Raphael and jap hentai doujin No.1912951235, but I don't know how this would translate into the drawings here.
How can you tell which is art and which is just regular porn?
This probably needs a bit of discussion
No.642[D][DF]
What's guro but sexulized gore?
What conversation can you have about that?
How is that comfy?
i really dont think nudity or guro are things that can work in 22chan, after all, this place was meant to be a escape from 4chan.
No.643[D][DF]
Would it be possible to make /f/ normal board instead of this table mode? Or at least make /f/ threads display like normal threads in /all/.
No.644[D][DF]
I support fixing the /f/ threads in /all/, but making /f/ look like the rest of the boards is really fucken gay. Such /f/ boards always look really unfinished
and gay.
No.645[D][DF]
Since hovering already shows you the post I think it would be nice if clicking on a mention took you to the mentioned post
No.648[D][DF]
>>647can you list the current threads you see as bait?
No.649[D][DF]
>>648(current threads/comments so far)
https://22chan.org/b/res/5639>fuk u oldfag larper>other shitty half-assed comments that he made for why 22chan sucks, even tho other anons made better critisims of our site then nova.https://22chan.org/b/res/5868the whole damn thread at this point
https://22chan.org/b/res/2527post number 6503
(kinda funny tho)
https://22chan.org/b/res/5428older thread
anddd that pretty much it.
i just want to protect our future.
No.651[D][DF]
>>647Well I think it's a pretty shit suggestion, anons should be thinking more critically what is and isn't bait instead of being spoonfed and sheltered
No.652[D][DF]
>>651this. Rather interested in hearing your definition of b8,
>>647. It almost seems like you're falling into the mindset of "everything contentious is b8," which is patently false.
No.653[D][DF]
>>138I don't like how your id is the same no matter what thread you post in, even if it's another board.
It should be exclusive to just one thread.
No.654[D][DF]
auto update doesn't really work, i have to click "Update" for each new post
No.655[D][DF]
It would be awesome if you could actually allowed for tor users to browse your imageboard.
You know like, you can browse, but you aren't allowed to post here from the Tor browser.
No.664[D][DF]
Sowwy for shitting up the discord thing disctrannies.
I'm actually sure this could be pulled off, but i tried to cross board link to a post on a thread, but it didnt work out. Do you think it can be done?
No.665[D][DF]
>>664like this? >>>/f/384
No.666[D][DF]
>>665yeah, like that.
test
>>>/yu/923#1358 No.667[D][DF]
>>666you're doing it wrong, satan
>>>/yu/1358 No.672[D][DF]
It would be handy for autists like me if the comment field showed me when the comment is too long (before I submit)
Also youtube embeds could take in consideration the time
No.673[D][DF]
I'm actually curious on what browser you lads use, and how it affects 22chan,
like for me, i've been using firefox, then i switched over to brave and now it's lightning fast. livechan takes less time to load, and there's less captcha errors. perhaps it a chromium thing. Perhaps it handles PHP better? (mind you, this is not internet related, i have 5G wifi connection, and i tested this on both computer and moble, and it's both the same results)
No.676[D][DF]
>>673I use firefox on both my pc and phone and on the phone it's super buggy. You can open the reply window, type something and the close it again and see the thread you were just in but you can't scroll anywhere so your quoting needs to be planned ahead...
>>138I bookmarked the site but unfortunately the site's icon doesn't appear in the bookmarks toolbar (it does on the tabs though). idk if that's on the site or my browser.
No.678[D][DF]
>>677nice dubs fren, yeah that sounds nice.
No.693[D][DF]
delete /pol/
No.694[D][DF]
>>693How about cleaning up pol because its current state is a trashfire?
No.695[D][DF]
>>694maybe it's for the best, once /pol/ starts dominating an imageboard it usually goes to shit.
No.701[D][DF]
>>677no, cause copyright and stuff. Nothing i feel like dealing with
>>694Bring up some suggestions on what should be deleted/etc.
No.702[D][DF]
>>701>Bring up some suggestions on what should be deleted/etc.this list is less based in politics, but is centered on quality of the threads themselves :
>>>/pol/10the thread itself should have been posted in /sg/, also one anon posted the normalfag "shreks cringe compilation" meme. pretty old anyways.
>>>/pol/8AMA thread
>>>/pol/376old news, less political discussion.
>>>/pol/6less elaboration on op's part.
>>>/pol/491it started with two threads. one on /b/, and this one on /pol/. the one on /b/ was spamned with normalfag memes like LETS GET THIS BREAD IS THAT A JOJO REFFRENCE and such, which is why the thread got deleted.
the main issue from the start is, op is a normalfag and uses those memes, and op came in with a group of people to spam and shill their idology. the pol thread itself is cucked. "anarchist general" oh wait no ancaps. 22chan isnt a personal blog and to use it so is a normalfag assumtion of how imageboards works. to male matters worse op is the type of guy to say : "my opinion gud your opinion bad and if you dissagree fuck you". also normalfag memes like ok boomer was said. a cursed thread in general.
>>>/pol/873obscure shit about god being racist, op has yet to elaborate behind the meaning of this or how it relates to politics or philosophy
>>>/pol/899normalfag wojack, op posts a link and doesnt elaborate. nothing really to talk about.
>>>/pol/902op posts obscure shit and fucks off
>>>/pol/2>yeet.jpgyeah, no. normalfag pepe trump. what doesnt help is theres nothing exactly to talk about besides blacks jews and niggers should be killed. nothing really to talk about.
>>>/pol/420gay shitty propaganda, no elaboration by op, and like, the third terrant thread. nothing really to talk about.
>>>/pol/151"the stock markets gonna crash in 2019!!!!!?!!!" actually it didnt old news old thread with nothing really to talk about.
>>>/pol/904screenshot of normalfag meme on reddit, no real elaboration by op, nothing to talk about
>>>/pol/12shitty meme thread with nothing really to talk about.
>>>/pol/664slight elaboration by op, but its a dead thread that no one cared about.
>>>/pol/14a quick dead hitler was a nice guy meme thread
>>>/pol/367dead thread about migrating to myspace
>>>/pol/888posts link, doesnt elaborate or express himself
if soneone has something else to add, or feels like i am wrong please mention it, i'm not trying to be a bitch, i just feel like we can clean up pol a bit.
No.703[D][DF]
>>702all of /pol/ is in a shit state. i would say that it's better for it to stay that way. the downfalls of a lot of imageboards have been directly because of edgy politics. by having /pol/ practically as /trash2/ like it is now, we are more or less immune to edgy plebbitors manifesting there.
No.715[D][DF]
A few ideas for the 22chan timezone:
Don't shift it in minutes in regards to utc
It would be cool if one could use a thingy in a post that would show the time depending on the timezone of the person viewing time.
>We meet at 12:30 (22chantime)
and it would appear to a guy browsing like:
>We meet at 12:30 (22chantime, 14:30 your timzone)
Or maybe when you hover your mouse (but then in needs to be a slightly different color to make you understand that you need to put your mouse on it)
or something like that. Just y'know an idea
No.719[D][DF]
>>138My suggestion is to rid the board of all dates, times, and post numbers. There should not be anything "quantifiable" here.
No.726[D][DF]
>>725you DARE suggest the deletion of the sewers???????!!???
No.738[D][DF]
>>725then post in the other boards, they exist for a reason.
No.740[D][DF]
>>738/b/ replaces all of them
No.775[D][DF]
I mean if it isi not broke do not fix it.
No.782[D][DF]
>>138I would like it if old threads got deleted. A month max tbh
No.783[D][DF]
>>782NO
However, it might not be too bad of an idea if:
1. It was at least 3 months, not 1 and
2. It was not deleted, but moved to a different page, the archive, like it happens on 4chan, where you can't reply anymore but can see the threads
It seems reasonable because necrobumping is considered a bad thing anyway, right?
But you know that's just my opinion that I'm not too sure about. What do you people think?
No.784[D][DF]
I think all threads should stay until they naturally get bumped off
No.785[D][DF]
>>783actually good idea. I don't like having a bunch of threads from last year on the boardm but an archive would be a good idea and 3 month limit.
No.786[D][DF]
here's my opinion :
necrobumping isn't exactly an issue here. only people who've complained are newfags, and it is bad if someone gives a low quality reply to some thread. steve was a bot who was removed because he necrobumped threads when no one was on.
if a thread seems boring make a new one, and yes we do have an archive
https://22chan.org/archive/index.php?r=/after several new threads are made, older ones get archived. there is a 5 page limit added already to threads so i kinda feel like this is a non issue.
No.787[D][DF]
>>786tldr
make new, high quality threads if the old ones feel stale
also lurk moar and see the archive, there's cool shit in there
No.807[D][DF]
>>138The small textbox is a tad unwieldy for writing larger pieces of text, which forces me to use MS Word before actually writing the post here. Maybe add a button to make it larger or the ability to resize it somehow?
No.808[D][DF]
and shouldn't the pepe image of this thread be changed to something else since neither pepe nor wojak are really accepted on this board? Since it's, you know, a pinned thread.
No.835[D][DF]
Please add the supported file formats and their maximum size to the FAQ.
No.851[D][DF]
>>850Ah i think what the problem is
No.853[D][DF]
>>851i'll try to fix this asap
No.858[D][DF]
>>857Is this a joke post or something? if not, wait untill you see "n1gger". it's really not made to be taken seriously, but if this is a joke post then i'm quite the idiot and i tip my hat to you master ruseman.
bamboozled again No.861[D][DF]
When one posts under a certain IP and then travels to a different location with a different IP, his user ID is still the same. Is this necessary? It seems that clearing one's browser cache is necessary to get a different user ID with a different IP.
Why are proxies banned btw? (This also affects mobile users who use different points of public wifi).
No.865[D][DF]
I suggest rewording rule 8:
>Complaining about 22chan (its policies, moderation, etc) on the imageboards may result in post deletion and a ban, unless it's valid criticism with a well detailed point and offers a reasonable solution.
It's a fine rule, but the order makes it come across as standoffish and the whole thing is overly wordy. To new users, it looks like you actively quash dissent. I've been here long enough to see that this is not at all true. To make the point just as firmly but more sensibly, try something more like:
>Complaining about 22chan without detailed points and potential solutions may result in post deletion and a ban.
This is more professional, accurate, and it uses better grammar.
No.866[D][DF]
>>138It'd be neat if you could upload multiple files in one post. Other altchans I've been on have this feature and I think it would improve our site. It'd be nice to just easily dump images without going through the pain of making the post and completeing all the captcha. Even just a maximum upload of 3 would be welcome.
No.867[D][DF]
>>866instead of this id want for the posting system to be fixed so i dont have to see "FLOOD DETECTED POST DISCARDED" all the time if i want to post more than 1 picture
No.870[D][DF]
>>850>>865fixed
>>836no, why
>>808calm down bossman
No.871[D][DF]
>>870>no, whyOn not a single imageboard there is a need to post some text when posting flashes. It's retarded and counter-intuitive for people who come to 22/f/ from other boards. The flash itself should be the one and only primary required thing on /f/. If you don't want for the post to be empty itself for whatever weird reason then make it post some pre-set default text if the field is left empty.
No.872[D][DF]
I don't think these's ideas need their own threads to discuss them.
* Give people the option to make their thread a "textboard" thread. all images are disabled and there isnt a need for op to post the image in order to make a thread. it would take away the issue of finding a good or high quality related image to start a thread, and easier to have a ascii art or a pure text based conversation. it could only be implemented as an option in the boards that need it, say /pol/, /yu/, /i/, and /b/. i think the issue though is i don't know if anyone would even use it, or use it too much. but it beats having something that would split up the userbase more like a seperate site. probably tough to make though.
When you click a post number, a small menu appears with the following options (along with post deletion options):
>Quote text
>Quote post No.
>Quote image filename
When you quote something using this method, hovering your pointer over the quote will preview the post you quoted, even if it's just the text or filename. Kinda better then ">>12345" style quotelinks.
When viewing a thread, selecting any portion of text on the page will result in a tooltip with an option to quote the selected text, which will automatically copy and paste that text into the post form when you click it.
No.873[D][DF]
Although i feel like it might be impossible to implement or whatever. here's something that should be easier, and everybody would like
Shift JIS emojis for livechan, and old 4chan stuff like pools closed.
I can think of only one issue i had recently where i get an error and it messes up my post like
here is my post
>>123
hello
i make the post but i get an error like improper captcha and i go back to re-post my post but it looks like
>>123
hello>>123
Other then that everything's perfect. i also like the /cat thing in livechan.
No.891[D][DF]
Germany is an awful country with an Orwellian stance on freedom of speech. Any website hosted in it will inevitably be shit. Captchas are just annoying and functionally useless. Flood controling is better.
The post box can't be expanded horizontally for some reason, only vertically.
It's also funny that 22chan doesn't allow any porn because it's supposed to be "comfortable", but it has a /b/, /k/, /yu/(/r9k/) and /pol board. That is all.
No.892[D][DF]
>>891>Germany is an awful country with an Orwellian stance on freedom of speech. Agreed, now people's houses are getting raided because they said something political. Seems like america is moving in the same direction. and i'm also hoping they won't take 22chan down.
>Flood controling is betterWhat's that?
>It's also funny that 22chan doesn't allow any porn because it's supposed to be "comfortable", but it has a /b/, /k/, /yu/(/r9k/) and /pol board.22chan's theme is relaxed conversations and avoiding the cancer that made 4chan bad. With /b/ it's more for discussions about topics unrelated to the other boards and about whatever, Any funposting/shitposting is moved to /sewers/. /k/'s kinda dead but there's a nice thread about some guy making gunpowder. /pol/ got taken over by polfags for a while, (which is why it kinda looks autistic) but banning them because everyone disagrees with them politically is a bad idea, (although rude, they didn't break the rules) and they also left. /yu/'s r9k without cancer. is more of a place to discuss feelings, emotions and rant.
i guess the boards here are more of a positive spin on things.
No.893[D][DF]
>>892>What's that?Preventing someone from making too many posts within a short interval. Blocking certain urls and url extensions. Maybe perceptual hashing could block certain images too.
>avoiding the cancer that made 4chan bad.The cancer that made 4chan bad was normal people, and too much traffic in general. As soon as it deviated from otaku interests, the flood gates were opened for the moralizing people who conform to wider society's values in some way or another(which included moot). Fast posting also invariably discourages quality posting. 4chan was mostly bereft of quality discussion from day one, people just have rose tinted glasses about it.
No.894[D][DF]
>>893Also, it's annoying how the reply box that pops up can't be moved or minimized. The legal button thing is ridiculous too. Is that just necessary because EU shit?
No.895[D][DF]
>>894it can be minimized tho, with the
Close button top right, but yea, the gay legal checkbox is because of shit kraut laws
No.896[D][DF]
>>895It can be closed, but if I want to quote somebody multiple times or reread some part of their post it's inconvenient. For a long discussion that's usually something that happens.
I just took a quick peak at /a/ and I think it validates everything I wrote here
>>8932d porn is a big part of otaku culture, so having it around is absolutely more comfortable than having people mindlessly shitposting about how everything is shit and you need to go outside more or whatever normals like to say all the time.
No.898[D][DF]
>>893YEAH we have that, and a url blocker but i'm not sure about the image blocker twoot probably should investigate.
i agree with the post speed and normalfaggotry.
The spam/flood filter works pretty well and the anti normalfag rule we have keeps them away, but there isn't much otaku interests here yet besides anime and manga discussions then and there.
>>896Part of the EU laws say no nsfw but also, its one of those set in stone thing since twoot doesnt want porn on 22 whatsoever. ecchi is fine i think.
>whatever normals like to say all the time.we drove normalfags that posted that stuff here away tbh
No.904[D][DF]
You'll likely call me a faggot for this, but GR17 needs to be abolished.
The furry part is fine, but I'm pretty sure the lgbt ban violates all kinds of anti-discrimination laws. Even if you can technically get away with it, it's kind of a retarded thing to do. Might as well ban people for being black
No.905[D][DF]
>>904Well we dont ban black people. Faggots, trannies and whoever else tend to be camwhores and whatever content they make tends to be cancerous. Just take a good look at 4chan.
No.906[D][DF]
Not only that but lgbt shit for the most part is nsfw, so it works out. Could some guy mention that he's gay? maybe, as long as it isnt cancerous but its still playing with fire, and it never works out.
No.907[D][DF]
>>905>>906How the hell is existing nsfw?
There is nothing inherently pornographic or camwhorish about discussing being gay or trans or whatever. It's just a part of life. Might as well ban people for saying they have girlfriends. It's the same shit. People should be allowed to discuss their lives on this image board.
No.908[D][DF]
>>904>>907I think the issue we have is with the low quality (either /pol/ spam or attention whorish attitudes) that often comes with such discussions online
Also, not all "people should be allowed to discuss their lives on this image board": this is a direct consequence of rule one. We aren't trying to be fair and open to everybody, we're trying to be a community dedicated to a specific "style" of communication and associated culture (No normalfags)
That being said, you might have a point: not all discussion on those topics is inherently bad. I'm not sure though how to improve the rule, or how others feel about this
[spoiler]I'm no mod nor do I represent the opinion of anybody else to be fair[/spoiler]
No.909[D][DF]
>>908just remove the part that says, "in any form". If it really is too degenerate or cancerous, then it should be banned under nsfw, or attention whoring, or some other rule.
>We aren't trying to be fair and open to everybody, we're trying to be a community dedicated to a specific "style" of communication and associated culture (No normalfags).There are many different topics that can be discussed within the same "style", in fact, any topic can really. And since when are all lgbt people (and furries for that matter) fucking normal fags?
I don't know what you'd call the opposite of a normalfag in your book, but they come from all kinds of backgrounds.
No.910[D][DF]
>>909It doesn't matter if they're gay or whatever, it's just that gay posting is generally cancerous.
No.911[D][DF]
You can discuss the ethics of banning homosexuals all you like, But much like the rules, They are static and will not change. (They can be refined, of cource.) And you have the choice of either dealing with it, Or leaving to find some other imageboard that suits your needs. No one needs to cater to every newfag., lurk moar op.
>>904>The furry part is fine, but I'm pretty sure the lgbt ban violates all kinds of anti-discrimination laws. Even if you can technically get away with it, it's kind of a retarded thing to do. You yourself admit that you understand why we ban furries, you should be able to stand in our footsteps then. If you had read the rules, you would also understand that The use of 22chan is a privilege, not a right. The 22chan moderation team reserves the right to revoke access and remove content for any reason without notice.
>>907 >There is nothing inherently pornographic or camwhorish about discussing being gay or trans or whatever. It's just a part of life. LGBLT Is inherently sexual by default. (rule 21 breakers) anal sex, masturbation, pornography is common topics, although not all the times still happens. Then the memes, "femboi" "boi pussi" and others are both annoying, cancerous, and normalfaggy. "Traps" take pictures of themselves in womens clothing (sexual or otherwise) which is both doxxing, and not in-line with site culture. Homosexuals/Transgenders whine how they are getting discriminated, needing representation in
everything, fight with and cry about "cis hetrosexual homophobes" and then cancel people if they even attempt to say anything to critqe. You know or have seen how furrys are, how they act. (Dramawhores, if you will.) Even if discussions are about their own relationships,you know, in a non sexual manner, Then what? "boo hoo x poster is a homophobe" "my boyfriends dad is a homophobe and fuck you for agreeing" and then tumblr teir discussions being rampant on all the boards (thus changing site culture to be less comfy) I'm sort of reminded of the whole "femanon" nonsense. It doesnt matter who you are, but no, they have to act narcissistic and insert the fact that their gay or whatever everywhere. Places like Forums, boards like r9k, They've taken over everything, and every form of media. 22chan is a nice, relaxing break from all of that.
>Might as well ban people for saying they have girlfriends. It's the same shit. >People should be allowed to discuss their lives on this image board.Well, yes and no. Normalfags self gratify over how perfect their lives are, how many people the've slept with, being in relationships with women, degeneracy, sexual or otherwise. which isn't in-line with site culture. if it can be discussed in a non normalfag manner, or has a need to be mentioned contextually, sure. Neets and Wizards are celebrated at 22chan. although people with relationships are welcome, as long as the topic doesnt break rule 1, 21 and 18 or bragging about getting laid.
>>909>since when are all lgbt people (and furries for that matter) fucking normal fags?When they became commonly accepted in modern society.
No.912[D][DF]
>>894>can't be moved or minimizedpic related
>Is that just necessary because EU shit?yep
>>904>it's kind of a retarded thing to doi dont care if gay people post on 22chan as long as they dont make any lgbt/gay/etc related posts
No.916[D][DF]
i cant post any flashes on /f/
"An error has occured.
You didn't make a post."
No.917[D][DF]
>>138an archive for /f/ (in 22chan.org/archive, obviously), but saving flashes probably would take too much space so archive only the posts and the flash filenames
No.918[D][DF]
>>912what qualifies as an lgbt/gay/etc related post?
No.919[D][DF]
I wanted to post this on livechan, but it gave me the error "Error: invalid body", so I'm posting it here instead
My browser bitches about an expired certificate, also the random page takes a few seconds to load all the messages which is annoying. Finally, subjectively I think the animation for when you click on a reply should be a little different: firstly it shouldn't put your view with the replied message at the bottom. It should be at the top, middle or somewhere in between. Secondly I don't think the highlighting should stay permanently until you click something, or it should be less intense. Thirdly, the message sliding right feels a bit unfitting with the retro-ish esthetic of this site, but that's just my opinion
Anyway it's cool to see the new features, thanks!
No.920[D][DF]
>>917Saving the thread without the file would not make sense as many /f/ posts are mainly based around the flash being the main content and the body is most of the time empty.
>>918gay shit
>>919sorry, i forgot to renew the ssl certificate. I am lazy but i have done it now, everything should work again
No.926[D][DF]
/trash/ thread on /stuff/ is locked for some reason so i'll post some trashworthy threads here.
here's some shitty /i/ threads
>>>/i/949unfunny gay/communist joke tldr op didnt understand the "no gay in any form" thing
garfield = prob discordfag injoke which honestly makes it more unfunny
op forced shit and of course, the whole thread got derailed because no one really likes it.
>>>/i/837low quality thread that some newfag probably made of an edited stock image that no one really likes, doubt its recoverable.
>>>/i/887>>>/i/853op made these threads as cross board spam, dont know if english is not his forté because he doesnt know how it works, also begging and generally low quality.
No.927[D][DF]
>>926trash thread is locked as /trash/ was deleted, i'll take a look at the threads
No.938[D][DF]
Anon(>>935) suggested having a "meet-up" time for livechan, with a timer on the website, to help actually have real-time interactions
No.939[D][DF]
>>938i'll cross link it for you
>>935ur wel cum
No.945[D][DF]
This is monafont, (on some old imageboard) It's the same art, but much smoother. Here is where it can be installed.
http://monafont.sourceforge.net/index-e.htmlTLDR premium shit which is pretty much the standard for ASCII and ShiftJIS art
No.949[D][DF]
greentexting wins over spoiler (probably should be the opposite)
[spoiler]
>be me
>greentext in spoiler
>mfw
[/spoiler]
On firefox. Also spoiling with 2 asterisks is slightly different than using tags. Small margin thing, no issue. Though I do like the fact that two asterisks make the spoiler effective as soon as you post (while the tags require refreshing the page)
No.957[D][DF]
Clicking a flash in /all/ does not load the ruffle.
It instead tries to download the flash.
No.958[D][DF]
>>957Back in the day ruffle was univercal, so like it worked in /yu/ on the comfy thread. I wonder what happened.
No.960[D][DF]
>>959Bad newfags/normalfags are usually content with staying on 4chan
But when they do find us we have rules and negative community reactions against the low quality garbage they bring
It's not a bulletproof system, but it's worked so far
No.963[D][DF]
>>962how does rule one apply here desuka
No.964[D][DF]
>>961no reason to make a fitness board if there's no discussion yet, make a thread and see how it goes.
No.974[D][DF]
>>138I feel like the OP thing should be an option you should toggle on a thread, because for some threads it honestly isn't needed. I don't need to know the OP on a /sewers/ thread, and i don't want to be OP on some of the threads i make. Some threads work well with OP, some don't. And just like pol, When you clear your cookies it removes OP from your post, requiring you to tripfag making the OP thing kinda useless anyhow.
No.975[D][DF]
>>974>I feel like the OP thing should be an option you should toggle on a threadthat sort of defeats its purpose though, that would lead the same fagging that was happening before,
and anyway it seems unnecessary and having an additional option only serves to bloat the site more than it needs to be
also good riddance to pol, it was only a matter of time until the same pol cross-board faggotry that plagues the other chans popped up here as well and it was best to axe that before it became a problem
No.976[D][DF]
Do you think we need a /k/ if no one really uses it? How many /k/ fags do we even have? Perhaps replacing it with a diffrent board that everyone might use is a good idea unless i'm overthinking it.
No.977[D][DF]
On the topic of /k/, the sticky there still references /pol/
No.978[D][DF]
>>976perhaps some more general boards that would encompass a couple boards, like an outside board or smth
No.980[D][DF]
>>978i feel like for now, to keep a somewhat good speed on all boards, we should probably not add any more
No.981[D][DF]
Probably should update the sticky on /vg/, since there isn't a discord anymore (and is the minecraft one still up?)
https://22chan.org/vg/res/1 No.982[D][DF]
>>981No, it's been down for a while now.
No.988[D][DF]
>>972i'm gonna consider this
>>981has been done
No.990[D][DF]
>>988what are your thoughts on
>>945 ?
No.993[D][DF]
>>949>>965Fixed
>>945added that font
>>961shutup chad
No.994[D][DF]
testing ascii testing ascii testingascii testingascii testingascii testing
No.1000[D][DF]
>>999Nice trips. This is something i actually wanted to mention but i forgot to, and it made me remember. I've been here for a long while and i know that no one gives a fuck about "necrobumping". It's an issue from other altchans and old 4chan but not us. We do get pissed when someone bumps an old thread or project with a shitty, low quality post or literally just posting "bump. Also, its nice to see someone notice and respond to an old post i made that got ignored for a year or something untill just now and it becomes an interesting active thread/conversation. I tend to lurk the catalog and read every single thread and post on every one besides dead projects or threads that required a OP that left the board never to return. but as you stated theres issues with old or extra long threads. One of which twoot mentioned in the "talk about anything thread"; it was WAY too long and the page got all slow and buggy. Having a TON of old threads (lets use /yu/ as an example) makes absolute newfags or retards think "shit slow chan im outta here" although if you actually look at the old threads, they are quite active and have TONs of recent posts on them. I think twoot can help with this issue by adding a thing that deletes the thread after a certian number of posts are made
I was thinking of something too like add a timer the OP can set, like "i want my thread to be deleted in a week/month/day" but i feel like it could be abused, like a retard making a shitty thread on /b/ and it getting set to delete in a day, or
worse, a QUALITY thread that ends up getting deleted in a day because OP was nervous no one would like it. Honestly i like the freedom that idea gives but as you can tell it could be abused easily. I like your idea of a 30 day deletion period but i see a potential flaw. Lets say all threads have that feature, and like on the hyperbeam/tuturu thing, everyone left because of school or collage. So theres a low number of posters. Not only that but lets say theres one or two active threads per board.
Now lets say the timer went off, and threads got deleted. No one posts on k and that board woudl get nuked, same goes with /f/ and we'd lose tons of threads on every other board besides two and 22chan would look bare bones. We would probably be able to make new threads easily to replace the old ones but there wouldnt be too many posts on them and from a newfags perspective, "wow look like two active threads on each board, shitty dead chan im outta here"
I'm not trying to be rude and i agree with you. i'm just trying to iron things out and think of any potential issues.
No.1001[D][DF]
>>1000*besides two per board adding up to at least 20 threads
No.1002[D][DF]
excuse me for being retarded but i need to correct myself again
>>1000*"wow look like two active threads on each board with 8 posts, shitty dead chan im outta here"
but yeah if that feature was added we could (as you said) easily adapt and whip up new threads, it would change our posting habits which is fine
No.1003[D][DF]
>>999>>1000The bus-stop.net has a very nice time-based system. Post last 24 hours, and they're all on one page
However, I don't think it would make sense to attempt something similar here, because by this point it's established what 22chan is. It wouldn't make sense to change it completely now, and I think most anons wouldn't like that (because they enjoy it as it is)
There really is no way to introduce any time constraints without changing this site completely/deleting 80+% of its contents
At most an /experimental/ board could be made, where different mechanics can be tested for fun. But that's a lot of work for the admin, and considering that livechan usually gets less than 10 visitors per day it's probably not worth it from his perspective
No.1004[D][DF]
>>1000>22chan would look bare bonesThis is exactly what I'm worried about and those boards you mentioned, too. /k/ would definitely just up and die. I think /vg/ could be in danger of dying too, it's not that active. I'm 95% sure that if anons could choose their own expiration date it would be abused. I think both of your reasons are valid cases. Lurking the catalog is fun and you often find something interesting. Old threads do get bumped from time to time. For the expiration date idea to work we would need a larger userbase and then we're in danger of normies finding us. I like the little unknown-corner-of-the-internet vibe the 22chan community has.
>>1003I agree that this would change the site considerably. When I discovered the site I found it a little off-putting that whatever I post here could stay up for a year or even longer. However this can work in our favor as it forces you to carefully consider what you post. The Nexus Forums do the same thing basically, users cannot delete their posts so it forces them to consider their posts carefully.
What if a thread could be reported for inactivity? I think this could be useful in threads such as
>>>/yu/2117. The OP is long gone and the thread is long dead but it doesn't violate any rules so it stays up. Report it for inactivity for the mods to delete it. To prevent abuse I think misuse of this feature should be severely punished. Then again this could lead to an old thread full of cool and interesting posts to get deleted.
No.1005[D][DF]
>>138twoot said 400 posts was too long, so how about 300, then the thread auto-deletes or locks up?
No.1006[D][DF]
>>1005At the moment i do that manually though and i like having the control over it
No.1007[D][DF]
>>1004>What if a thread could be reported for inactivity? I'm dubious it'd work. It's just too hard/subjective to determine which threads are worth keeping even if inactive and which should get deleted/archived
No.1008[D][DF]
>>1007Yeah, in hindsight I think so too.
No.1009[D][DF]
The art tool isn't working on /i/, it wouldn't submit either of my drawings...
No.1010[D][DF]
Cross-board/thread links should take you to the right page when clicked
For example, right now clicking
>>>/sg/915 won't take you to
https://22chan.org/sg/res/860#915Right clicking + open in a new tab works, but it's a bit inconvenient as I'm not sure everybody will figure it out
No.1015[D][DF]
>>1014lol even the cat is confused
No.1016[D][DF]
I feel like it would a good idea to ban migration threads like
https://22chan.org/vg/res/805 as those people are just jumping around imageboards and only bring destructions to the imageboards they go to. They will not and are not planning on adapting to the community that is build around 22chan, and do not even have the motivation to read and respect the rules whatsoever. Threads like these are not made with this website in mind and are all build around the community where it hence came from, they only bring more people that will try to destroy this website in the future. I just do not understand how these migration threads benefit 22chan in the slightest.
No.1017[D][DF]
>>1016It shouldn't be that every single migration thread should be banned but there needs to be a completely different approach to when one is allowed to be created. I'm not sure how this issue should be handled but one way I believe would be a person asking with approval from one of the moderators if they are allowed to create the migration thread they want to create. Where the said moderator would first take a look what community they are dealing with and if they are worth being allowed to come to this website.
No.1018[D][DF]
>>1016>>1017I agree. That thread was of poor quality, or at least the migrated posters were. They didn't bring anything good to the site. They just popped in to shit up the place and left once they got bored. This will just shit up whatever board it happens on if it happens again. When I tried to check out the 4chan thread it had 404'd. I think they got b& for raiding lol.
No.1019[D][DF]
some1 pwned livechan, fix the xss twoot!