Anonymous 02/29/20 (Sat) 22:19:14 No. 567 [ D] [ DF]
are you talking about the somewhat guro cyclops pic?
that shit isnt really appropriate for this place man, keep it comfy
Anonymous 02/29/20 (Sat) 22:22:45 No. 568 [ D] [ DF]
also ive no clue about the thread itself, it just seems to be gone, ill notify twoot
Anonymous 02/29/20 (Sat) 22:23:06 No. 569 [ D] [ DF]
Yeah, dude, that pic was as the reaction pic, lol. Alright, I'll trying to keep this place comfy as it is...thanks for not banning my ass for that.
Anonymous 02/29/20 (Sat) 22:25:01 No. 570 [ D] [ DF]
Wait, you mean on the thread with the reply of rabbit? That thread have disappeared somehow? Weird.
Anonymous 02/29/20 (Sat) 22:26:17 No. 571 [ D] [ DF]
If you mean the bunny typewriter webm, I deleted the thread (as OP) because it was a failure, even before nobody replied, it was badly conceived.
Anonymous 02/29/20 (Sat) 22:28:34 No. 572 [ D] [ DF]
i dunno man, could've been an interesting thread, the only problem was that the initial pic you posted and the thread's rules made it that all of the thread would have had some dark feeling to it, so maybe there's a way to make it a bit differently if youre up for it
Anonymous 02/29/20 (Sat) 22:33:03 No. 574 [ D] [ DF]
yeah, that was the problem, I don't really know what random thing I should post without having any reference, but I think I have an idea.
Anonymous 02/29/20 (Sat) 22:34:05 No. 575 [ D] [ DF]
Yeah, that's a shitty rule, the owner should change that.
Anonymous 02/29/20 (Sat) 22:36:35 No. 576 [ D] [ DF]
nah, s'ok, this thread can stay for future reference for people maybe. but i can delete it if you want to
Anonymous 02/29/20 (Sat) 22:44:15 No. 577 [ D] [ DF]
Op is saying that he can't delete his post, and he should be able to do so when he pleases.
Anonymous 02/29/20 (Sat) 22:47:17 No. 578 [ D] [ DF]
yeah i understood that, but being able to delete a thread "whenever one pleases" isnt really a feature ive seen before, there's always at least been time limits.
Anonymous 02/29/20 (Sat) 22:49:13 No. 579 [ D] [ DF]
I don't care, you should be able, and in any way the 2 replyies limit is too small.
Anonymous 02/29/20 (Sat) 23:16:05 No. 581 [ D] [ DF]
>>580 >remove their statements mid-argument when they feel like it
And what's wrong with that? Why wouldn't be able to have that right?
Anonymous 02/29/20 (Sat) 23:27:21 No. 583 [ D] [ DF]
it's a pretty jewish move in my opinion, a some weeks ago an avatarfag on 4/qa/ was namecalling 22chan and making false accusations, when refuted he deleted his post so he wouldnt look like a complete retard to even more people.
also not being able to delete statements during conversation forces the person to elaborate it/ fix it in a new post detailing why exactly that post isn't valid, so they cant go for the nigger move of "i dindu nuffin"
Anonymous 02/29/20 (Sat) 23:28:25 No. 584 [ D] [ DF]
that baby picture was pretty gorey
Anonymous 02/29/20 (Sat) 23:38:52 No. 585 [ D] [ DF]
That first case is very retarded, you can't look like a bad in an anonymous forum, you are literally anonymous. Also, while I understand that this forces you to not make the move of deleting you own invalid points, you need to comprehend that it's pretty useful for when you make annoying mistakes, like when you misread a post and you answer something wrong, or when you answer the wrong person.
Anonymous 02/29/20 (Sat) 23:44:49 No. 586 [ D] [ DF]
>>585 >you can't look like a bad in an anonymous forum
i disagree, as i said, it made the avatarfag look bad and people knew it was the same marcelineposting nigger from spacechan.
of course it's something much more visible with avatarfags or namefags, but those previous statements tend to serve the progression of the conversation in specific tracks, and when these tracks are suddenly changed, questions begin to arise.
>useful for when you make annoying mistakes
well yeah, you notice that shit quickly and fix it in the allotted time and within the reply count
Anonymous 02/29/20 (Sat) 23:47:30 No. 587 [ D] [ DF]
Avatarfags don't need to do anything to look bad, their mere existence is already cancer.
Anonymous 03/01/20 (Sun) 00:30:21 No. 588 [ D] [ DF]
>>579 >I don't care, you should be able
yeah no you shouldn't be, this is not reddit faggot, else you will not think before writing something retarded like you did now and the place will become shit filled.
Anonymous 03/01/20 (Sun) 15:01:16 No. 589 [ D] [ DF]
>>588 >the place will become shit filled
Literally how? People would delete their post so there would be no shit whatsoever.
Anonymous 03/01/20 (Sun) 15:21:12 No. 590 [ D] [ DF]
but that would mean that actions have no consequences whatsoever, and people could accidentily delete their own threads
Anonymous 03/01/20 (Sun) 18:23:20 No. 594 [ D] [ DF]
Mhhh... well put I guess, you convinced me