/t/ - Science/Technology


/t/ - Science/Technology

For discussion of Science, Technology and Math
Catalog

File: 2014-august-1-4chan-logo.png (82.19 KB, 400x361, 400:361, 1563074658641.png) [Show in Hex Viewer] [Reverse Image search]

 No.150[Reply][D]

Im Planning to make my own futaba style imageboard so send links to futaba style imageboard scripts

 No.153[D][DF]


 No.155[D][DF]

thanks >>153 but I think im gonna use kusabax because ive already used them and they did not work but thanks for you suggestions



File: BF1CA1C6-F724-4246-A57D-B….jpeg (39.57 KB, 318x159, 2:1, 1562751779200.jpeg) [Show in Hex Viewer] [Reverse Image search]

 No.149[Reply][D]

Does the 2nd law of thermodynamics imply the extinction of humanity?
You see, entropy always increases in a closed system, such as the universe. That means that the entropy will get higher and higher. But human bodies I'm pretty sure aren't peak entropy. At one point to grow further entropy will have to destroy all human bodies. Any sorts of computer human replica too, and I'm pretty sure anything that can move on its own/think. Entropy is disorder, and those two things require some order.
Am I wrong? Is there something I'm not considering?

 No.151[D][DF]

>>149
As we understand it, yes, the laws of thermodyamics does imply that humans, and everything else in this universe will all end up a giant cloud of weakly interacting particles. However, scientists don't estimate that happening for another googol years or so (a 1 with 100 zeroes after it). That's plenty of time for humanity to thrive, flourish, and potentially maybe figure out a workaround for the whole entropy thing. After all, something had to put our universe into its initial high-energy low-entropy state, so who's to say it can't happen again?

 No.152[D][DF]

>>151
In my opinion, humanity will go extinct long before entropy becomes an actual problem.

 No.154[D][DF]

>>151
Makes sense. Thanks for restoring my hope!
>>152
Makes sense. Thanks for destroying my hope!



File: cirtel.png (1015 KB, 1920x1080, 16:9, 1557914436477.png) [Show in Hex Viewer] [Reverse Image search]

 No.134[Reply][D]

https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=Microarch-Data-Sampling
MDS: The Newest Speculative Execution Side-Channel Vulnerability.


File: Capture.PNG (1.71 KB, 331x31, 331:31, 1557106661508.png) [Show in Hex Viewer] [Reverse Image search]

 No.116[Reply][D]

Share your custom JS/CSS

 No.118[D][DF]

File: JS_BTFO.png (2.75 KB, 804x24, 67:2, 1557170237053.png) [Show in Hex Viewer] [Reverse Image search]


 No.120[D][DF]




File: systemd-logo.png (5.11 KB, 577x333, 577:333, 1549659390914.png) [Show in Hex Viewer] [Reverse Image search]

 No.37[Reply][D]

What's wrong with SystemD

 No.43[D][DF]

>>37
Bloated

 No.110[D][DF]

File: 1555277339354.png (346.21 KB, 1011x2802, 337:934, 1556305349580.png) [Show in Hex Viewer] [Reverse Image search]


 No.111[D][DF]

>>37
It's stable, fast, industry standard and well organized.



File: first-image-of-black-hole-….jpg (476.85 KB, 2880x1920, 3:2, 1555087130387.jpg) [Show in Hex Viewer] [Reverse Image search]

 No.90[Reply][D]

First picture of a black hole. Just imagine, these were total conjecture not too long ago. And now we have photographic evidence. I once heard it said that saying you believed in black holes when they were first theorized about was like saying you believed in unicorns; you'd get laughed out of the room.

 No.91[D][DF]

Just think, this was the black hole 5 million years ago, that's kinda scary to think...

 No.93[D][DF]

>>90
Low quality black hole

 No.94[D][DF]

File: lin_2048.png (92.83 KB, 600x579, 200:193, 1555108521322.png) [Show in Hex Viewer] [Reverse Image search]

>>93
hi-res computer generated render

 No.97[D][DF]

>>94
>>90
The images look so pretty.

 No.99[D][DF]

>>99



File: 300px-Neutron_quark_struct….png (27.32 KB, 300x424, 75:106, 1554604801116.png) [Show in Hex Viewer] [Reverse Image search]

 No.88[Reply][D]

if we had a vertical gluon production, like two beams with a weight?


File: Looking at the stars.jpg (70.73 KB, 720x480, 3:2, 1554244009091.jpg) [Show in Hex Viewer] [Reverse Image search]

 No.84[Reply][D]

Do you think there's non-earthling life in the universe?
How much? How far away, or how close?
Is it peaceful, or warlike? Intelligent, or primitive?
Do you think we'll ever make contact?
If so, will we contact them, or will they contact us?
How might we communicate with them?
How would humanity react to the discovery of intelligent life?
Are we doomed to be alone?
And any other discussion regarding extraterrestrials.
No /x/ bullshit pls.

 No.85[D][DF]

im mean if you think about it, outer space is so large that in all that space on at least one of the planets out there there has to be life, the could be millions of planets out there that can support life and we we cant see them because they are just far away, there is no way earth just happens to be the only planet to support life

Your fortune: Average Luck

 No.86[D][DF]

>>84
I Think india is another universe

Your fortune: Average Luck

 No.87[D][DF]

>>84
life exists everywhere, mostly bacterial
most likely warlike unless exists a planet where resources are abundant
we will but in a very very long time due to time dilation
dont know who's gonna contact first
don't know how we might communicate with them
humanity would probably be suprised for a while the move on with their lives
we're doomed to be alone because its easier to create virtual reality than try to fiddle with physics through science



File: download.jpeg-1.jpg (7.85 KB, 138x192, 23:32, 1553979074774.jpg) [Show in Hex Viewer] [Reverse Image search]

 No.78[Reply][D]

Is someone smashed an exotic atom with the gauge bosons using the metallic hydrogen Anvil at Harvard into some sort of cyclotron that accelerates neutral atoms


File: 1*ZkZS46p7Lbw-PDBtPMfEEw.jpeg (85.26 KB, 1024x724, 256:181, 1552828305651.jpeg) [Show in Hex Viewer] [Reverse Image search]

 No.62[Reply][D]

Anyone doing something in Machine Learning here? Need ML buddies to talk to...

 No.63[D][DF]

>>62
I dont know if Markov chains count as ML, but i want to get into ML.

 No.64[D][DF]

>>63
Markov chains are very handy in the Reinforcement Learning, anon

 No.71[D][DF]

>>62
https://gitlab.com/milan44/steve

This is what i've built using markov chains, but i would like to improove the text he generates... The Problem im facing is that there is no good implementation of recurrent neural networks in php.



File: php-ml.png (4.4 KB, 683x83, 683:83, 1551871717875.png) [Show in Hex Viewer] [Reverse Image search]

 No.46[Reply][D]

I built an machine learning ai with php-ml to classify new threads as 'good' or 'bad' using their text.

Thoughts on how to improove it?
12 replies omitted. Click here to view.

 No.65[D][DF]

>>46
Is code online twoot? Have you posted this on Github? If yes, can you link the repo? I'm interested in NLP.

 No.66[D][DF]

>>65
Its not public but im thinking about making it public

 No.68[D][DF]

>>65
Actually nevermind, i forgot that i stopped using it because it was inacurate as shit.

But i've made steves code public, if you're interested: https://gitlab.com/milan44/steve

 No.69[D][DF]

>>68
Why not Github?

 No.70[D][DF]

>>69
I prefer gitlab. I just like their UI more than the one by github.



File: Bell_1870647i.jpg (49.82 KB, 620x619, 620:619, 1548965067322.jpg) [Show in Hex Viewer] [Reverse Image search]

 No.34[Reply][D]

Seems like the right board for this.
Theories, cool shit, creepy shit, whatever you got regarding the ocean (especially the deeper parts), put it here.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L8xXnVkOGsA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YaPZUsiiqzw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GJPRW92Yqd0
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mantis_shrimp can punch hard enough to cause flashes of light, or so I've heard.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bloop (Probably just an iceberg breaking up, but still pretty neat)

>tfw you'll never be a crew member on board the Nautilus

It hurts.


File: path2d-380.png (25.63 KB, 760x380, 2:1, 1548041956308.png) [Show in Hex Viewer] [Reverse Image search]

 No.27[Reply][D]

Friendly reminder to any anons in the area concerned: a lunar eclipse is beginning now!!! GO LOOK AT THE MOON RIGHT NOW!!!

 No.32[D][DF]

It wasn't that good :(
The moon gradually got covered by the earth, then it was just very dim with slight red
t. western Canada



File: G3Vneu7.gif (128.99 KB, 180x180, 1:1, 1547440785483.gif) [Show in Hex Viewer] [Reverse Image search]

 No.23[Reply][D]

give me a reason you would not jailbreak your iphone

spoiler: you cant

 No.24[D][DF]

File: 274.jpg (47.42 KB, 640x586, 320:293, 1547530661180.jpg) [Show in Hex Viewer] [Reverse Image search]

>iPhone

Heh

Heheh

Hahaha

Haahahaha

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

OHH NO NO NO NO

 No.25[D][DF]

File: 14255157542180.jpg (81.36 KB, 600x600, 1:1, 1547560010861.jpg) [Show in Hex Viewer] [Reverse Image search]

>>23
>iToddler
ahahahaha
no

 No.29[D][DF]

Because I have an android.

 No.72[D][DF]

File: 1541643913023.png (17.13 KB, 409x406, 409:406, 1553116352317.png) [Show in Hex Viewer] [Reverse Image search]

I do not normally operate a Steve Jobs brand "my first cell phone" because I am not a faggot.

 No.98[D][DF]

File: 1244 - 8YJuKc1.jpg (11.48 KB, 526x526, 1:1, 1555168866120.jpg) [Show in Hex Viewer] [Reverse Image search]

>give me a reason you would not jailbreak your iphone
>spoiler: you cant
>you cant
I'm not paying the price of my kidney for an overpriced, limited piece of shit.
YOU give me a reason why i would buy it



[1] [2] Next | Catalog