>>82
It is a low quality thread.

>>82
Abusing the webm feature and a low quality thread. You can go to a regular porn site if you want those kinds of threads.

>>85
Sharing webms I find fun/interesting which I think anons may enjoy as well is abusing the webm feature?

>>86
The webm feature is meant for you to share videos to improve the quality of your thread. An example of how the webm feature should be utilized is like the new TF2 and Metal Slug threads on /vg/ where people create their own webms to share gameplay footage they experienced or the Chibi Maruko-chan thread on /a/ to share webms of the anime that were interesting. I'm not saying you shouldn't post any webms that aren't your original creations you should just tread carefully as to how you use it and not repost everything you find on d*scord, t*wtter, or 4ch*n.

>>86
I'm not about to allow for people to make a thread on /b/ that keeps getting bumped and stays on top on the thread chain that has nothing to offer apart from a bunch of anons spamming it with a bunch of random webms they found without any context. Why should that low quality thread get priority over the threads that require you to put in effort?

(4.32 KB 225x225 )

>>88
Why do you assume the thread is low quality just because it revolves around posting videos? Maybe I post an interesting video that sparks a discussion? Maybe someone posts a webm from a different country and anons discuss what it's like to live there? Maybe anon has already been there and can share stories? Maybe anon posts a webm and wants to know others opinions on said webm? A thread like this could literally be a goldmine for all kinds of discussion. And what makes you think a thread like this would take priority over other threads? Since we're so focused on qualityposting, wouldn't they be evenly matched? There's already a thread on /b/ that revolves around posting Youtube links, how is that thread any different? It's the same gimmick, just links instead of webm files.

I for one thought that retarded cat video was very interesting. The editing and pace of the video felt like an assault on the senses, it was so strange. The song felt stupid but I found myself humming it hours later. I loved the low budget animation style. I thought it was a very weird video and I thought anon might get a kick out of it.

I know qualityposting is our whole thing (and I love that about 22chan) but I swear, sometimes you guys feel like one of those helicopter parents who put massive effort into keeping their kid sheltered and safe but end up hurting the kid in the long term. I did not intend for that thread to be a dump site. I intended it as a thread where anons could share cool, miscellaneous videos and have a good time.

>>89
Then maybe put some effort into the OP to indicate it isn't just a dump thread. That couldn't be so hard could it? The Youtube thread you mentioned does not just have just "Post Youtube videos." as its post content but actually tells people to elaborate on them because every random who finds 22chan just assumes it's a dump thread and will dump his shitty webm folder on there.

>>89
The questions you mention in your post is absolutely what I would love to see in a thread like that but why is it that you think everyone just assumes the same as you do without you elaborating first? Why is it so hard to make a OP that isn't just a single sentence. You have all the time in the world to create your thread and to destroy any misconceptions that people might have about it.

>>91
Do you also need someone to tell you what to post because otherwise you'd just smash the keyboard? Fucking retard

>>92
Since we're all about quality here I assumed anons would get the message and not post mindlessly but you make a good point.

>>93
I lol'd but let's not devolve into name calling.