>>3256
and if an EMP or something goes off, guess what will happen? steam powered trains will keep on kicking!

I wish i could travel on trains like they do in the old days, it's too bad there isn't any near me.

>>3967
That reminds me weirdly about the time my brother and sister's school bus got hit by a train. It was only the back, and somehow they were all ok with no injuries. It is just crazy how bad that could have been. I probably am misremembering what happened.

>>3973
damn franky got hit by a train and he had to remake himself into a cyborg, i wonder how he avoided injury, just a guess but maybe there was something that had to do with the airflow that cushioned the blow?

>>3976
I assumed the hit was minor and like you said the airflow protected them. This memory can also be a figment of my imagination.

I wish mew a meowy catmas and a catty mew years

i was such a fucking idiot a.d sold my copy of megaman zero collection for the ds and by the skin of my fucking teeth i bought a copy from some old man who didn't know better for 4 bucks.
maybe i thought i'd make a lot of money off of it, but once you sell something you can't buy it back and if you try, sometimes the price will be too much. lesson learned.

>>3897
It's nice to have a portable verson of the arcade game. the music selection is nice too although at the moment it's limited because i have to earn more bt playing. persona 5 music was a nice touch.

age

(431.66 KB 720x5573 )

X3

>>3949
>ominous
majoras mask moon, but cheeto sun

>>3949
I'll try to take that as good sign. Cheeto son please watch over me this year!

>>3797
It's not that complicated, it's Doug Walker conducting three smaller versions of himself like the Chipmunks. The real enigma is what the C on the main Dougmunk's shirt stands for.
>>3949
Reminds me of King Crimson

>>3958
C stands for cat, clearly.

(12.14 MB 1280x720 00:00:48)

>>3958
frustrating to think that there are people in these spaces who don't know about avgn or nostalgia critic

>>3948
It is midway through the decade and it feels like nothing notable or good has happened.

>>3953
You're being unfair. Chatgpt and other AI generation stuff is pretty notable. As for good, I mean, good things are probably more subtle and gradual at happening than bad things

>>3954
How is that unfair? When I say things are not great, it is mainly referencing how things have done nothing to change in the average person's life. Subtle things that help out the elite are fine, I guess, but when the decline is more noticeable, there is an issue. When things are getting worse, the unequal positives are just a bandaid to a bigger wound.

>>3955
You said "notable". A computer speaking like a human is notable. As for the rest, I wasn't trying to argue

>>3957
I think the recent news with the tesla truck and the military man shooting himself in it is weird as fuck, infact there's a hell of a lot of fucking strange news going on this year.

>>3851
just to clarify the reason it specifically state "in any form" instead of no "lgbt topics" or "person" because in my eyes it appears easy to fudge the rules. keep in mind my examples are doghshit but it is what comes to mind. with "no lgbt people" you can argue a song is not a person or a tumblr cartoon like helavaboss is not a gay person, with "no lgbt topics", define topics, is a meme a topic? what if i want to celebrate Lili Elbe's art, the artist is trans, sure and you can ban that but actually not really because the artist paints landscapes and its not like anyone will google the artists name to crosscheck. you can't extrapolate anything from "in any form". let's say theres a problem, like an anon contacts the staff via email, or /meta/ or whatever, about how he wants to discuss the game catherine, but there is a trans character named erika, and he doesn't want to be banned for discussing the game. well as long as he doesn't discuss the character at all then where's the problem? if "in any form" is hard to understand there is nothing banworthy or wrong with actually asking the staff or community. i just see it as a means of reducing headaches of people bickering the specifics or weaseling there way in. no, means no. in any form, mean in any form it comes in.
>This is a more complete reflection of 22chan's historical position
any attempt to change or alter the anti-lgbt rule will remove the historical implication. the previous admin was worried of the "slippery slope" that if you make one change or excuse, then more will come untill 22chan becomes something that it never was. any changes or excuses will make newcomers think that 22chan doesn't "want lgbt that isn't annoying" or something of the sort instead of downright banning it. back in the day the rule was added partially because a group of people who enjoyed furfags, trannies, ect, was makimg threads of that type on 22chan and also because it was a suggestion of the users, https://web.archive.org/web/20190605003222/https://22chan.org/sg/2.html thread 96 being one example of a user based suggestion.
i'm slightly paraphrasing here but the previous admin went as far as to state that he didn't want "no gay ass niggas" posting on his site, and that this means "memes, people, the movement" and if anyone had a problem they could "go back to 4chan"
no gay funposting, no shitposting, no ironically gayposting. not the people, none of it. i can understand if a certain rule can be clarified and re explained in a way to be more clear, without losing the original intention, but some of them cannot be altered in my opinion.
>>3849 if there are posts in this thread that actually breaks the rules of 22chan, or any board specified rules, you should report it using the email or something.
>>>/meta/42/
there is a thread on /meta/ for moderation requests.
if it doesn't break the rules, you can make a thread on /meta/ about something you dislike. making a post asking for something to be deleted that cannot be moderated as if the 22chan staff are personal watchdogs is retarded.

>>3849
There are many who have designs upon this world and dream of wild and vast reformations. I have heard them talking in their sleep of elegant mutations and cunning annihilations. I have heard them whispering in the corners of crooked houses and in the alleys and narrow back streets of this crooked creaking universe which they, with their new designs, would make straight and sound. But each of these new and ill-conceived designs is deranged in its heart, for they see this world as if it were alone and original, and not as only one of countless others whose nightmares all proceed like a hideous garden grown from a single seed.

(1.48 MB 240x240 00:00:03)

>>3854
>i just see it as a means of reducing headaches of people bickering the specifics or weaseling there way in
Fair enough, I can see where you're coming from, it is a difficult thing to regulate. Doesn't that reveal an issue with the presentation of the rule? The example in >>3850 eliminates the question of "how far removed can something be from a lgbt person before it's safe for discussion" by pinpointing the area of concern. This is easier for moderation ("this post clearly discusses a user's love life, ban them") and for users ("am I violating a rule by talking about this piece of media, even if I'm not specifically talking about the lgbt part?")
Maybe the concern isn't exactly discussion of romance/sex, but I still think there's value in finding a rewording that more precisely locates the issue. Seems like a win-win.
>>3856
Fuck, I know nothing of this guy or his special plan

>>3856
>>3858
Apparently its taken from this https://genius.com/Current-93-i-have-a-special-plan-for-this-world-annotated
https://youtu.be/lxZpEFJhO6k [Play]

(5.19 KB 708x54 )

>>3850
>>3851
>>3854
>>3858
We decided to change it based on this discussion.

>>2698
well, i guess it makes sense to see trolling behaviour since the poster is anonymous, they feel they can pretty much do whatever without any consequences. i would say though dispite that atleast with imageboards the trade off is being able to avoid forum behaviour and (depending on the rules of the board and the community) have free-ish speech and conversations you normally wouldnt see on forums.

I can't say I can differentiate between genuine and pseudo-intellectualizing but I can tell you one of them is definitely more common and would tend to be called out more.

>>2698
It is hard to make your point in a concise manner which makes the onlooker think you are just trying to make yourself smarter than you are. Also, the amount of pseudo intellectuals makes it hard to know if someone is not acting in a self-praising manner.

Be sure to tell us if those French Canadians can do Western food right !!!【⬢皿⬡】 「○ヽ○」

>>3669
this isn't 4chans /b/

>>3669
Is OP a faggot? I figured this is random so the question is applicable?

Let's turn it into a /ck/ related thread any ideas?

>>3673
bbq i guess
thoughts on brisket? especially good on a sandwich with sauce, onions and pickles!

>>3674 Not sure what this thread is supposed to be but here's an automated translation...

>The Ghost Incident at Manza Kogen Hotel

>The Manza Kogen Hotel, located near Kusatsu-Shirane Mountain and built over ancient hot springs, holds a strange history that is said to linger even today. This land was once part of a small, isolated village where people revered the mountain as sacred and worshipped the hot springs as if they were gods. According to local legend, when the mountain showed signs of unrest, the villagers would perform rituals near the hot springs to try to calm its powers.

>One particularly well-known tale speaks of a young woman who was taken to the hot springs in the dead of winter and sacrificed to pacify the volcanic activity. After that night, misfortune befell the village: the mountain erupted violently, toxic smoke spread over the land, and the villagers were forced to abandon their home and flee.

>Years later, when the hotel was constructed, some workers reported strange occurrences, such as tools mysteriously disappearing or eerie sounds. However, these incidents were often attributed to the harsh natural environment. Yet over the years, some hotel guests have reported feeling a chilling presence around the hot springs at night, and a few have even claimed to see a young girl with long black hair standing by the water’s edge.

>The hotel remains a popular destination, though locals continue to pass down these old stories. Visitors are sometimes advised to show respect for the legends and to avoid approaching the hot springs after dark.

>>3675
I hope it's not a botpost because it sounds cool as fuck. I wonder if they still encounter paranormal incidents there to this day?